U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 5 (of 5): Operations in West KoreaUnited States. Marine Corps
History
U.S. Marine Operations in Korea, 1950-1953, Volume 5 (of 5): Operations in West Korea
United States. Marine Corps
Korean War, 1950-1953 -- Campaigns; United States. Marine Corps -- History -- Korean War, 1950-1953
Whereas February was characterized by a marked increase in ground
contacts between Marines and their CCF adversaries, during the first
part of March the Chinese again assumed an inactive posture. Marine
patrols reported few contacts. Except for a KMC raid on 3 March, little
action that could be considered a sizable engagement took place until
after midmonth. On the 16th there was a brief skirmish involving a 5th
Marines combat patrol near Reno and a short fire fight between Carson
defenders and an enemy squad. The next night a Chinese platoon, waiting
near Vegas for a Marine patrol to pass by, was itself put to flight by
the patrol.
Two encounters with the CCF on 19 March marked the heaviest action
yet of the month. Early that morning, a predawn raid was staged by
B/1/5 (Captain Theodore J. Mildner) at Hill 31A, one of the Ungok twin
objectives in CLAMBAKE the previous month. The March ITEM raid employed
111 Marines. One platoon was to make the assault and the second platoon
to support the operation and assist in casualty evacuation. Following
a series of nearly a dozen air strikes on the objective and artillery
preparation, Captain Mildner’s two assault platoons jumped off from
the MLR check point at 0518. As usually happened in such operations,
the preliminary fire drove the Chinese to reverse slope defenses. No
enemy POWs were taken and at 0700 the Marine units disengaged, due to
casualties sustained from enemy shelling and machine gun fire.[351]
[351] Prior to the raid various combinations of flamethrower
fuels and pressure were extensively used. The purpose
was to determine the maximum effective range of
the flamethrower teams in order to “neutralize the
hand-grenade throwing potential of the enemy, this being
one of the major problems confronting assault elements on
other raids.” Final tests resulted in flame being thrown
more than 40 yards up hill. 1/5 ComdD, Mar 53, App. IVf,
p. 3.
Earlier that same date, two attacks had been made simultaneously by
the enemy on outposts in the center regimental sector, where the 1st
Marines had relieved the 7th on 10 March. At 0105 one CCF company
struck in the vicinity of Hedy while a second lunged at Esther, about
1½ miles east. When a G/3/1 reconnaissance patrol operating forward
of COP Esther observed enemy movement, the Marines pulled back to
the outpost, alerting it to the impending attack. After a heavy
incoming artillery barrage, the enemy assaulted the outpost, but when
a three-hour effort failed to carry the position, the attackers
withdrew. By that time the Chinese company which had hit COP Hedy had
also broken off the attack.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account