Ukrainian literature : $b Studies of the leading authorsManning, Clarence Augustus
History
Ukrainian literature : $b Studies of the leading authors
Manning, Clarence Augustus
Ukrainian literature -- History and criticism
Yet with all of the drawbacks and the troubles, life in Kiev was good
in the twelfth century, until in 1169 Prince Andrey Bogolyubsky of
Suzdal in the north sacked the city and moved the centre of the state
to his native town and then later to Moscow. The interpretation of
this action has long been a bone of contention between Ukrainian and
Russian scholars. To the latter it was a necessary and logical step in
the development of the Russian Empire. To the former it was a brutal
conquest of a civilized government by foreigners and strangers. It
did cause a sharp break in history which was emphasized still more by
the fact that the new centre was never able to assert its authority
over Galicia and Volynia to the west. The dynasty reigning there even
was able for a time to call themselves the Kings of Rus. Whatever the
merits of the controversy over the relations of the princes of Suzdal
and Moscow to those of Kiev and the south, the fact remains that
Kievan Rus and Ukraine was now split in half and was not to be brought
together again fully except for a few months in 1918 and 1919.
Perhaps the damage would have been alleviated, if time had allowed the
normal development of Moscow. The coming of the Mongols and Tatars
changed everything. When the hordes of Genghis Khan swept over the
land, Kiev bore the brunt of the desolation at a time when it had
hardly recovered from the sack of the preceding century. The princes
of Moscow readily submitted and henceforth the Tatar element and
traditions grew in the northern capital. This process continued for two
centuries and at the end of that period, when Ivan the Great finally
declared his independence and assumed the title of Autocrat and Tsar
of Russia, the manners and customs of Moscow were very different from
those which had prevailed at the time of the coming of the Tatars.
Ukraine had a different fate. The western provinces formed a dangerous
wedge between Poland and Hungary and extended into the area claimed
by the Latin world. The Holy Roman Empire was pressing eastward with
the Germans as the nucleus and the predominant power. Poland and
Hungary confronted with this turned east in their turn. Both were Roman
Catholic powers and western in culture and organization. Both were in
frequent alliance and their dynasties were related by marriage. It was
to the interest of both to crush Rus with its Orthodox traditions and
its Byzantine culture. To the north was Lithuania, still pagan but with
able rulers. To make a long story short, the end came in 1349 when the
Western principalities of Ukraine fell under the power of Lithuania
and Poland. At about the same era the people in the Carpathians passed
under the control of Hungary. Lithuania acquired control of the area
around Kiev, so that by the time of the marriage of Jadwiga of Poland
and Jagiello of Lithuania in 1385, a large part of Ukraine was under
the control of Catholic rulers and the remainder was under the Tatar
yoke.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account