Diplomatic and consular service, American; United States -- Colonial question; United States -- Politics and government
“Article 1. Diplomatic agents are divided into three classes: That of
Ambassadors, legates or nuncios; that of envoys, ministers or other
persons accredited to sovereigns; that of chargés d’affaires accredited
to ministers for foreign affairs”.
Three years after the Congress of Vienna the Congress of Aix la Chapelle
adds an eighth article, which reads as follows:
“Article VIII.—It is agreed that ministers resident accredited to them”
(to sovereigns, presumably) “shall form, with respect to their
precedence, an intermediate class between ministers of the second class
and chargés d’affaires”.
Consequently the classification of our diplomatic officers is as
follows:
1. Ambassadors. We do not send or receive legates or nuncios, as there
are representatives of the Pope, and to do so would be contrary to our
national policy respecting church and state.
2. Envoys, ministers or other persons accredited to sovereigns. This
class includes that official with the ridiculously lengthy title of
envoy extraordinary and minister plenipotentiary—usually called minister
“for short”.
3. Ministers resident, who are usually also consuls general. There are
but four of these in our service, and as there is little justification
for this grade it will probably some day be abolished.
4. Chargés d’affaires (pronounced shar-zha-daffair), who are not
accredited to sovereigns, but to the minister for foreign affairs.
It should be borne in mind that this classification has nothing whatever
to do with the transaction of business. All diplomats have essentially
the same duties to perform. It is merely a matter of precedence, which
was considered much more important at the time of the Vienna congress
than it is now. Indeed, there are good reasons for thinking that we have
outgrown these distinctions and should straightway abandon them. This
much, at least, is apparent to all—that the chief diplomatic officer at
every legation ought to be an ambassador, thus making no invidious
distinctions between countries.
[Illustration: DIPLOMACY]
As it is at present we send ambassadors to the most important countries,
envoys extraordinary and ministers plenipotentiary to those that are
next important to us, and so on. Thus there are five ambassadors; one
each at London, Paris, Berlin, St. Petersburg and Mexico respectively,
thirty envoys extraordinary and ministers plenipotentiary, four
ministers resident, and one who is classed as a chargé d’affaires.
There are secretaries of legation at twenty-three different capitals,
who in the absence of their chief may become chargés d’affaires
exercising all the functions of a diplomatic officer. At fourteen
different capitals there are military or naval attachés, sometimes both,
and an interpreter at six of them.
Legation, or embassy, formerly meant the particular business, the
errand, so to speak, upon which the ambassador was sent.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account