Under One Sceptre, or Mortimer's Mission: The Story of the Lord of the Marches — John Shaqi
Under One Sceptre, or Mortimer's Mission: The Story of the Lord of the MarchesHolt, Emily Sarah
General
Under One Sceptre, or Mortimer's Mission: The Story of the Lord of the Marches
Holt, Emily Sarah
Historical fiction; Mortimer, Roger de, Earl of March, 1328-1360 -- Fiction
"Not a rebel, Father," answered the low pathetic voice. "Only a child
too tired to work any more. Let me go to Him that calleth me."
"But there is much for you to live for, Lady——" resumed the confessor,
but she interrupted him.
"I know. And I would have lived if I could. I would have lived for my
little Roger. But I cannot, Father. Heart and brain and life are tired
out. God must have a care of my little child. I am too weary to tend
him. Let me go!"
They had to let her go. On the evening of the third day, with one deep
sigh as of relief in the ending of the struggle, she laid down the weary
weight of life, and went to Him who had called her.
The House of Mortimer of March was represented by those four lonely
little children, of whom the eldest was only nine years old. It seemed
as if every vestige of a shield for the tender plants was to be taken
away and they were to be exposed to the full fury of the winter blasts.
For a whole year little Roger was detained at Carrickfergus, nominal
Viceroy of Ireland, with his future still undetermined. This was not
the fault of the King, a boy only just fifteen years of age; but of the
commission of Regency which governed in his name. At the end of that
time orders came from Westminster.
Sir Thomas Mortimer was to bring home the little Viceroy, to receive his
exoneration from the arduous honour which had been thrust upon him, and
to deliver him to the Earl of Arundel, whose ward he had been made, and
with whom he was to reside till his majority. To Sir Thomas this news
was indifferent: he desired the child’s welfare, which, as he understood
it, was likely to be well secured by this arrangement. But as Guenllian
understood it, there was fair chance of the boy’s ruin. If there were
in the world one layman more than another who hated Wycliffe and
Lollardism from the centre of his soul, it was that Earl of Arundel to
whom Roger’s future education was thus entrusted. And the astute
statesman who was really—not ostensibly—the ruler of England, knew this
quite as well as she did. This was Thomas, Duke of Gloucester, the
youngest and cleverest of the sons of Edward III. And we have now
arrived at a point in our story which makes it necessary to interpose a
few words upon the state of politics at that time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account