Under One Sceptre, or Mortimer's Mission: The Story of the Lord of the MarchesHolt, Emily Sarah
General
Under One Sceptre, or Mortimer's Mission: The Story of the Lord of the Marches
Holt, Emily Sarah
Historical fiction; Mortimer, Roger de, Earl of March, 1328-1360 -- Fiction
This affection of the young Earl for the Green Isle by no means
increased his popularity with his English retainers. Saxon and Celt
have always mutually looked down upon each other. The Irish saw in the
English intruding strangers, none the more welcome for being conquerors;
the English reckoned the Irish uncivilised barbarians with whom no
person of refinement could be satisfied to associate. They were not
themselves so over-refined that they need have been particular: but the
half-educated man (still more woman) is usually more fastidious on the
score of vulgarity than the blue-blooded noble. There were murmurs
among Roger’s suit that he was too accessible to the masses, and that
his heart was rather Irish than English.
When the King discovered, somewhat to his surprise, that his chosen heir
had so unexpectedly disappeared from the scene on the plea of looking
after his Irish property, he sent him a commission of lieutenancy for
Ulster, Connaught, and Meath—a most convenient arrangement for Roger,
since it afforded him a full excuse for not returning to England until
the state of affairs should have changed. His Majesty was not the only
person who was puzzled by Roger’s proceedings. But there was another
person who was not puzzled at all. Of one point Roger might safely have
felt assured—that, however his sudden disappearance might surprise and
perplex others, his uncle Gloucester at least would not fail to
understand it. But the fact that a particular material had proved
unsuitable for his purpose was not likely to ruin the designs of so
far-seeing and scheming a conspirator as Gloucester. Having convinced
himself that his nephew of March was not the soft and malleable article
that he had supposed him, Gloucester merely cast the useless thing on
one side, and set his busy brain to work to evolve a fresh project. It
proved a very different one from the last. His new scheme involved a
partition of the kingdom into four parts, of which his brother of
Lancaster was to be bought off with one (a matter somewhat easier said
than done); York, who was plastic as putty in the hands of Gloucester,
was to have another; Arundel was to be rewarded with the third; and the
fourth fell to Gloucester himself. March was left out altogether.
How long this sagacious disposition of political affairs would have
lasted, may be very reasonably questioned: certainly not, at the
furthest, beyond the second generation. A quarter of England would
never have contented Derby, for whose ambitious soul the world was
scarcely wide enough, nor could Rutland have reigned an hour in his
division without plotting against the other three.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account