Under One Sceptre, or Mortimer's Mission: The Story of the Lord of the MarchesHolt, Emily Sarah
General
Under One Sceptre, or Mortimer's Mission: The Story of the Lord of the Marches
Holt, Emily Sarah
Historical fiction; Mortimer, Roger de, Earl of March, 1328-1360 -- Fiction
The end was near—the end of one phase of the political tumult. On the
28th of July, Gloucester and his fellow conspirators met at Arundel, to
perfect their plot. Just eight days later, in full Parliament, at
Westminster, that extremely "honourable man," my Lord of Rutland, humbly
presented a petition of impeachment against Gloucester, Arundel, and
Warwick. Five days afterwards Gloucester was arrested and sent to
Calais; and on the 8th of September he died in the Castle of that town.
The King had borne with him, to use his own words, "as long as he had
been able"—and no other Sovereign, perhaps excepting Henry VI., would
have borne with him half so long.
It was asserted by the King’s enemies, long afterwards, and is now
generally believed, that Gloucester was "murdered" by being smothered
between two feather beds. Unfortunately for the assertion, this very
report was spread, with the view of aspersing the King, while Gloucester
was still alive. The subsequent elaborate account, therefore, was
simply a more carefully revised version of the old slander. The truth is
that Gloucester was either privately executed, or that he died of
apoplexy before the execution took place. Why a man under sentence of
death, approved as inevitable by his own brother, the just and humane
Lancaster, should not have suffered execution, must be left to those
modern writers of the "follow-my-leader" school, who persist in terming
the execution a murder. How many times the penalty had been deserved it
would not be easy to reckon.
Things were not now, as previously, done by halves—except in one item,
and that spoiled the whole. The Earl of Arundel was beheaded on the 21st
of September. The Archbishop, Norfolk, and Warwick, were banished for
life. If one other execution had taken place, the rebellion would have
been crushed, and King Richard’s life would have been safe. It was
entirely his own fault that it did not. Derby had been engaged in a
multitude of plots—more than any one knew except himself—he had plotted
the death of the King, and had drawn his sword upon him in the Queen’s
presence: he had been twice, if not three times, condemned to death by
his own father. The Duke of Bretagne had said to the King on their last
interview, "You will never be safe while Henry of Lancaster lives."
Richard knew all this, but his heart failed him. For all the
provocation received both as monarch and as man, that true and tender
heart refused to condemn the old playmate, and instead of it lifted him
to honour. He fancied this step would ensure the love and fidelity of a
man who knew not what love and faithfulness were. He laid this adder to
warm in his bosom, and like the adder that it was, it stung him to
death.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account