United States Steel: A Corporation with a SoulCotter, Arundel
History
United States Steel: A Corporation with a Soul
Cotter, Arundel
United States Steel Corporation
5. Abolition of twenty-four-hour shifts.
6. Increase in wages sufficient to guarantee American standard of
living.
7. Standard scales of wages in all trades and classifications of
workers.
8. Double rate of pay for all overtime, holiday, and Sunday work.
9. Check-off system of collecting union dues and assessments.
10. Principles of seniority to apply in maintenance, reduction, and
increase of working force.
11. Abolition of company unions.
12. Abolition of physical examination of applicants for employment.
Some of these demands were merely camouflage, inserted to give the
public an idea of imaginary wrongs against the steel worker. The
steel companies generally have been trying for years to institute a
real eight-hour day and have made the eight-hour day the basis of
wage payments. Practically all steel workers work only six days a
week. The twenty-four-hour shift is borne by a very small percentage
of the workers and by these only on widely separated occasions. The
Corporation and its competitors as well, following its lead, have
repeatedly advanced wages without solicitation from the men, and
the claim that the wage they pay is insufficient to permit American
standards of living has not borne investigation.
But the acceptance of such demands as the recognition of the right of
collective bargaining, coupled with the check-off system of collecting
union dues and assessments, would have handed over the companies,
bound hand and foot, to the unions. The application of the seniority
principle in maintaining, reducing, and increasing working forces
would have obviously made for inefficiency and destroyed the incentive
to effort and good work on the part of the men. Finally, physical
examination of applicants for employment in an industry where sound
health, active muscles, and keen eye-sight are necessary not only for
the safety of the worker himself, but for that of his associates, was
a precaution which the companies could not dispense with in fairness
either to themselves or to their employees.
It is hardly necessary to discuss these demands in further detail. All
the circumstances indicated that they were merely a gauge of battle,
hardly intended for discussion.
These demands were announced by E. J. Evans, who in an interview with
press representatives was quoted as declaring that either they would
be accepted in toto by the Corporation or the steel workers would
strike within a week, shutting down the entire industry. This was about
the middle of August, 1919.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account