Vajra-chhediká, the "Kin Kong King," or Diamond Sútra — John Shaqi
Vajra-chhediká, the "Kin Kong King," or Diamond SútraUnknown
Religion
Vajra-chhediká, the "Kin Kong King," or Diamond Sútra
Unknown
Buddhism -- Sacred books
Subhúti, what think you? say not any of you that Tathágata thinks thus
within himself, “I must deliver all these sentient creatures?” Subhúti,
think not thus; and why? because in truth there are no such sentient
beings for Tathágata to deliver; if there were, then Tathágata would
immediately be subject to one of the _individual distinctions_.[13]
Subhúti, Tathágata in speaking of the _first distinction of
personality_,[14] declares that the term “I” is the same as that which
is not “I,” all other sects indeed believe in the reality of such
personality. But, Subhúti, this expression “all other sects” Tathágata
declares likewise to be a mere name, it is the same as that which is
the opposite of this term (_i.e._ the name is nothing).[15]
_Cap. XXVI.—The mystical body without any distinct characteristic._
Subhúti, what think you? is it possible to contemplate Tathágata
through the thirty-two “distinctive signs,”[16] which adorn his person?
Subhúti said: Yes! Yes! Tathágata is manifested through the thirty two
distinctive signs. Buddha said: Subhúti, if Tathágata is to be seen
through the medium of these signs, then every Chakrawarttí is the same
as Tathágata.
Subhúti addressed Buddha: World-honoured one! as I understand the
doctrine which Buddha declares, Tathágata cannot be seen through the
thirty-two distinctive signs. At this time the world-honoured one
delivered the following Gáthá, “He who looks for me through any
material form, or seeks me through any audible sound, that man has
entered on a wrong course, he shall not be able to see Tathágata.”
_Cap. XXVII.—But there is a period when it would be incorrect to say
that all laws and conditions of being must be disregarded and expunged._
Subhúti, if you should think thus, “Tathágata, by means of his personal
distinctions has attained to the unsurpassable condition,” you would be
wrong, Subhúti. Tathágata has not arrived at this state by means of any
such distinctions. But, Subhúti, do not come to such an opinion as
this, viz., “that what is called the unsurpassed, just, and enlightened
heart is nothing more than the mere neglect and destruction of all
rules and conditions.” Think not so, for why? the exhibition of this
perfect and unsurpassed heart is not the consequence of having
disregarded and destroyed all rules, in the active discharge of duty.
_Cap. XXVIII.—On not receiving and not coveting the reward of virtuous
conduct._
Subhúti, if a Bodhisatwa use in charity as much of the seven precious
substances as would fill sakwalas as numerous as the sands of the
Ganges; and if another man clearly understand the non-individual
character of all conditions of being, and by patient endurance obtain
perfection, the meritorious happiness of this Bodhisatwa exceeds that
of the former. What then Subhúti, as far as all the Bodhisatwas are
concerned there can be no such thing as the appreciation of reward.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account