Vajra-chhediká, the "Kin Kong King," or Diamond SútraUnknown
Religion
Vajra-chhediká, the "Kin Kong King," or Diamond Sútra
Unknown
Buddhism -- Sacred books
Subhúti, if there were a man who kept for charity enough of the seven
precious substances to fill innumerable asankyas of worlds, and if
there was a disciple, male or female, who aspired after the perfectly
enlightened heart, and adopted this Sútra and arrived to (the
observance of) the four canons, and carefully recited the various
passages of the work and proclaimed them generally for the advantage
of men, the happiness of this man would far exceed that of the other.
And in what way can the disciple “proclaim them generally?” simply by
relying on no conditions or distinctions whatever; thus he will act
without agitation or excitement. Wherefore the conclusion is this—
That all things which admit of definition are as a dream, a phantom, a
bubble, a shadow, as the dew and lightning flash. They ought to be
regarded thus.
Buddha having uttered this Sútra, the venerable Subhúti, and all the
Bhikshus and Bhikshunis, the lay-disciples, male and female, and all
the devas and asuras, hearing the words thus spoken, were filled with
joy, and believing they accepted them and departed.
[1] This is the well-known phrase, “evam mayá śrutam,” concerning
which Burnouf has a note (Lotus, p. 286). I will observe here that
the phrase in question was probably introduced by the compilers of
the Buddhist Sútras in order to give these writings the same degree
of sanctity which belongs to the Bráhmaṅas and Mantras, as forming
the “S’ruti,” or Sacred Revelation of the followers of the
Vedas.—_Vide_ Max Müller, Hist, of Sansc. Lit., p. 75.
[2] For a full account of this garden, _vide_ S. Hardy, M. of Bud.,
p. 218. [Hardy gives the name of the prince as “Jeta,” and the
gardenia called “Jeta-vana.” Burnouf Int. 22.—ED.]
[3] Subhúti is in Chinese “Virtuous presence.”
[4] Anuttara samyak sambodhi hṛdaya.
[5] That is, the natural heart.
[6] _Vide_ Julien ii. 390.
[7] These four distinctions (lakshaṅa) are constantly referred to in
this Sútra as the “four Canons,” or “Rules.” The idea seems to be
this: if a man so destroy all marks of his individual character as to
act without any reference to himself, or men, or other states of
being, or continuance in the condition of a living creature, then he
has arrived at the desired state of non-individuality, and must be
lost in the ocean of Universal Life. This is the Pari nirváṅa, the
condition of absolute rest—the desired repose of the Buddhist
disciple.
[8] That is, the four rules of non-individuality.—_Vide ante_, cap.
iii.
[9] The latter portion of this cap. is very obscure. I offer this
translation with diffidence.—S.B.
[10] I adopt the word “Karma” from Spence Hardy; the Chinese (_nieh_)
has a similar meaning.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account