Vajra-chhediká, the "Kin Kong King," or Diamond SútraUnknown
Religion
Vajra-chhediká, the "Kin Kong King," or Diamond Sútra
Unknown
Buddhism -- Sacred books
Buddha said: Subhúti, all the Bodhisatwas and great Bodhisatwas ought
thus to subdue and repress the risings of this corrupt heart. Whatever
species of creature there be, whether oviparous or viviparous, born
from spawn or by transformation, possessing a material form or not,
liable to the laws of mind or not, not altogether possessed of mental
organization nor yet entirely without it—all these I command and
exhort to enter on the state of the unsurpassed Nirváṅa (Pari
nirváṅa[6]) and for ever to free themselves from the conditions of
being to which they severally belong. The great family of sentient
beings, immeasurable, vast, numberless, being thus freed from such
states of existence, then indeed there will be no longer any such
beings to arrive at this position of perfect freedom.
I conclude, therefore, Subhúti, if there be a Bodhisatwa affected with
any selfish distinction, or any social distinction,[7] or any
distinction as a sentient being, or any distinction as a finite and
perishable being, then this Bodhisatwa is not one in reality.
_Cap. IV.—The characteristic of the most perfect line of conduct, is,
that it is spontaneous._
Moreover, Subhúti, a Bodhisatwa in the active discharge of his
functions ought to be without any object of reliance or desire
(_i.e._, unaffected by any secondary object in the discharge of his
chief business). When occupied, for instance, in attending to the
work of charity—his ought to be that charity which is called “unmixed
with any material consideration”—he ought to distribute his alms
without relying on (or, having any reference to) any sensible
gratification, whether it be of sound, or odour, or taste, or touch,
or thought.
Subhúti, a Bodhisatwa ought thus to discharge the work of almsgiving,
relying on no sensible distinction whatever. What then! if a
Bodhisatwa be thus charitable, having no reliance or reference, his
consequent happiness must be immeasurable and boundless. Subhúti! what
think you? Can the eastern region of space be measured by a line?
No, certainly, world-honoured one!
Subhúti, can the western, or southern, or northern regions of space be
measured? or the four midway regions of space (_i.e._, N.E., S.E., S.W.,
N.W.), or the upper and lower regions: can either of these be
accurately measured or defined?
No, certainly, world-honoured one!
Subhúti, the consequent happiness of the Bodhisatwa, who discharges his
charitable impulses in the distribution of alms without any reliance or
secondary object whatever: his happiness, I say, is likewise boundless
and immeasurable. Subhúti, a Bodhisatwa ought to rely on nothing
whatever, except this principle of my doctrine.
_Cap. V.—Regarding only the immaterial principle, we behold things in
their true light._
Subhúti, what is your opinion? Is it possible by any bodily distinction
to behold Tathágata?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account