Venoms: Venomous Animals and Antivenomous Serum-therapeuticsCalmette, A. (Albert)
Science
Venoms: Venomous Animals and Antivenomous Serum-therapeutics
Calmette, A. (Albert)
Antitoxins; Poisonous snakes; Toxins; Venom
Venoms are modified or destroyed by certain normal diastases of the
organism. It was shown long ago by Lacerda, Weir Mitchell, Sir Joseph
Fayrer, and Lauder Brunton, that it is possible to introduce without
danger into the stomachs of adult animals amounts of venom many times
greater than the lethal dose. I have repeatedly verified this, but have
nevertheless observed that young mammals, while being suckled, readily
absorb venom by their alimentary canal, and succumb to the ingestion
of doses scarcely larger than those which kill when subcutaneously
injected. Here we have a very important fact, which once more proves
how easily the intestinal mucous membrane of young animals is permeated
by toxins. By my instructions Wehrmann[64] and Carrière,[65] in my
laboratory, have studied the modifications undergone by venoms in the
alimentary canal of rabbits. We have seen that these animals can ingest
without inconvenience doses of venom 600 times greater than the lethal
dose, and that, if we cause these ingestions to be repeated several
times, contrary to the assertion of Fraser[66] (of Edinburgh), we
never succeed in obtaining immunity to the subcutaneous injection of a
simple lethal dose, and no antitoxin is formed in the blood.
The _ptyalin_ of the saliva, _pancreatic juice_, and _bile_ destroy
_Cobra_-venom _in vitro_. We must, therefore, assume that these
diastases are veritable agents of destruction for ingested venom. The
intestinal microbes play no part, any more than the intestinal juice by
itself. The gastric juice has very little effect. Papain is almost as
active as the pancreatic juice.
It had already been proved by Fraser, so long ago as 1895, that bile,
after prolonged contact and in a sufficient dose, has a strongly
destructive effect upon Cobra-venom; but, contrary to the opinion of
this investigator, it is not antitoxic, for it possesses no preventive
or curative property, and its effects are produced only _in vitro_.
We see from what has been stated above, that venoms introduced into a
sensitive organism are capable of producing extremely complex effects
upon the various tissues or humours. They act on the nerve-cells
by their _neurotoxin_, on the endothelium of the blood-vessels by
their _hæmorrhagin_ (Flexner and Noguchi), on the red corpuscles by
their _hæmolysin_, on the fibrin of the blood and muscles by their
_proteolytic diastase_, and on the fibrin-ferment itself by their
_thrombase_.
They also act on the leucocytes, according to the experiments of
Chatenay,[67] performed under the direction of Metschnikoff, and
according to those of Flexner and Noguchi,[68] already cited.
Thus we understand how complex must likewise be the means of defence
that have to be employed in order to afford an effective protection
against such poisons.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account