Visits to Fields of Battle, in England, of the Fifteenth Century: to which are added, some miscellaneous tracts and papers upon archæological subjectsBrooke, Richard
History
Visits to Fields of Battle, in England, of the Fifteenth Century: to which are added, some miscellaneous tracts and papers upon archæological subjects
Brooke, Richard
Battlefields -- England; Great Britain -- History -- Wars of the Roses, 1455-1485
{114b} In a note to Rapin’s _History of England_, translated by Tindal,
it is stated, with reference to the engagement at Ferrybridge, “there was
at this time no Lord Fitzwalter, for Walter Lord Fitzwalter died in 1432,
and Sir John Ratcliffe, son of Ann, daughter of the said Lord Fitzwalter,
had not summons to Parliament till the first of Henry VII. This Sir
John, or his son, is probably the same whom Rapin, and other of our
historians, call by anticipation Lord Fitzwalter. See Dugdale’s
_Baronage_, vol. i. p. 223, and vol. ii. p. 285.” But although it may
readily be admitted, that it does not appear from our Baronages, that
there was a Lord Fitzwalter in 1461, their silence seems scarcely
sufficient to outweigh the clear and unqualified statements, of several
of our old annalists and chroniclers, that a Lord Fitzwalter held a
command of importance in the Yorkist army, and was slain in the action at
Ferrybridge. Stow not only mentions that circumstance, but also states
that Lord Fitzwalter was one of the noblemen who, on the 12th of March
(before the battle of Towton), left London with Edward, and accompanied
him on his march northward. Besides which, in Leland’s _Itinerary_, vol.
i. fo. 105 [99] (see also Camden’s _Magna Britannia_, vol. iii. p. 49),
in noticing Ferrybridge, it is stated, “wher the first Lord Fitzgualter
of the Radecliffes was killid, flying from Cok beck Felde;” and, although
the last part of the passage is not quite accurate, still the statement
is of some value; and in Fenn’s _Collection of Original Letters_, which
are considered authentic records of the respective dates, at which they
purport to have been written, Lord Fitzwalter is mentioned, in a letter
from Clement Paston to John Paston, of the 23rd of January, 1460 (but,
according to our present mode of reckoning, 1461), as having ridden
northwards, and is said to have taken two hundred of Sir Andrew Trollop’s
men; and the existence of a Lord Fitzwalter seems still more confirmed by
another of those letters, which was written by William Paston and Thomas
Playter, to John Paston, dated the 4th of April, 1461, giving the
contents of a letter of credence from King Edward IV. to the Duchess of
York, respecting the battle of Towton, which distinctly mentions that
Lord Fitzwalter was slain, and that he had been engaged on Edward’s part.
(See Fenn’s _Collection of Original Letters_, vol. i. pp. 205, 219.) As
so many old writers have mentioned the existence of a Lord Fitzwalter at
that period, it seems improbable that all of them could have been in
error.
{115a} The Bastard of Salisbury, who also held a principal command in
the Yorkist forces, was also slain there. Some historians tell us that
the Earl of Warwick stabbed his horse on hearing of the disaster at
Ferrybridge. It is an improbable tale. We may perhaps safely admit,
that he, as a warrior, knew the value of a good horse too well to destroy
it wantonly and uselessly.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account