“Are you sure that you are not being led into some trap?” I asked.
“Suppose that your clue, whatever it is, should bring us only into the
presence of the Commissioner of Police and a couple of dozen cops!”
“My dear doctor,” said Knight, a little stiffly. “I would remind you
that I am no gambler.”
“I beg your pardon,” said I. “But I do not think you will find Jolnes.”
The cab stopped before one of the handsomest residences on the avenue.
Walking up and down in front of the house was a man with long red
whiskers, with a detective’s badge showing on the lapel of his coat.
Now and then the man would remove his whiskers to wipe his face, and
then I would recognize at once the well-known features of the great New
York detective. Jolnes was keeping a sharp watch upon the doors and
windows of the house.
“Well, doctor,” said Knight, unable to repress a note of triumph in his
voice, “have you seen?”
“It is wonderful—wonderful!” I could not help exclaiming as our cab
started on its return trip. “But how did you do it? By what process of
induction—”
“My dear doctor,” interrupted the great murderer, “the inductive theory
is what the detectives use. My process is more modern. I call it the
saltatorial theory. Without bothering with the tedious mental phenomena
necessary to the solution of a mystery from slight clues, I jump at
once to a conclusion. I will explain to you the method I employed in
this case.
“In the first place, I argued that as the crime was committed in New
York City in broad daylight, in a public place and under peculiarly
atrocious circumstances, and that as the most skilful sleuth available
was let loose upon the case, the perpetrator would never be discovered.
Do you not think my postulation justified by precedent?”
“Perhaps so,” I replied, doggedly. “But if Big Bill Dev—”
“Stop that,” interrupted Knight, with a smile, “I’ve heard that several
times. It’s too late now. I will proceed.
“If homicides in New York went undiscovered, I reasoned, although the
best detective talent was employed to ferret them out, it must be true
that the detectives went about their work in the wrong way. And not
only in the wrong way, but exactly opposite from the right way. That
was my clue.
“I slew the man in Central Park. Now, let me describe myself to you.
“I am tall, with a black beard, and I hate publicity. I have no money
to speak of; I do not like oatmeal, and it is the one ambition of my
life to die rich. I am of a cold and heartless disposition. I do not
care for my fellowmen and I never give a cent to beggars or charity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account