The accounts which we possess, written by eyewitnesses, of some of
the effects produced by the great preachers make marvellous reading.
In the hands of a John Elias, a Henry Rees, or a John Jones, the vast
congregation, standing before them throughout the long summer hours,
would be like clay. From tears to laughter, from ecstatic joy to the
profoundest sorrow and the most poignant terror, it would be moved by
a word, or even a gesture. So realistic and dramatic was the
preaching of John Elias that, on one occasion when he was describing
the Almighty letting the arrow fly from his bow, the whole vast
audience parted in two in order to allow passage for the shaft. So
powerful was the voice of Owen Thomas that, preaching at Bangor his
accents could be distinctly heard in Anglesey across the Menai
Straits. Needless to say, scenes of the most uncontrolled enthusiasm
would prevail. Fear of Hell, and hope of Heaven would alternate in
the hearts of the congregation; but in all the utterances of the
greatest preachers the dominant note was the compelling love of God
in Christ.
{216}
In the chapel, and in the federation of chapels, the Welshman learnt
the difficult art of self-government. The rule of the parson had
been an autocratic one; that of the Nonconformist bodies was, from
the first, democratic. Every official, including the Minister
himself, was chosen by a direct vote of the whole congregation. Even
in a further, and a different, sense Nonconformity was democratic.
Its members were mainly drawn from the middle and lower classes; and
its Ministers, until well advanced in life, were simple workmen--John
Elias a weaver, Christmas Evans a farm servant, John Jones a
quarryman, Williams o'r Wern a carpenter. The doors of the
Universities were closed against them; and Glyndwr's University of
Wales was still an unrealized dream. They were the poor preachers of
a poor people.
Did Nonconformity justify its existence? Was the life of Wales
cleansed and elevated? The answer of the impartial historian must
surely be an emphatic affirmative. Between the itinerary of the
preacher Giraldus Cambrensis, and that of the preacher Howel Harris,
a period of some five hundred and fifty years intervened; but it is
difficult to see that the Welsh people were at all higher, {217}
mentally or morally, at the later date than they were at the earlier
one. But add another hundred years, and no chance visitor would
suppose that he was seeing the same people.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account