Authors, English -- 19th century -- Biography; Critics -- Great Britain -- Biography; Pater, Walter, 1839-1894
The same tendency is reflected in the peevish monologue, attributed by
tradition to Mark Pattison, and often delightedly repeated by Pater
himself. The question of possible travelling-companions was being
discussed, when the Rector broke out with: “I would not travel with
Pater for anything! He would say the steamboat was not a steamboat, and
that Calais was not Calais!”
The example that he set was somewhat contagious. Those affected by it
became the most subjective of critics, and acquired the superficial
conversational method, which consisted in speaking of serious
things on social occasions as if they had no seriousness, and of
diligently searching for the ridiculous aspect that they could be
found to bear. There came a certain reaction at a later date against
this style of conversation, until the flippant treatment of topics,
however superficially amusing, came to be regarded with perhaps undue
impatience. But the fact remains that Pater was in ordinary talk,
through early years, _un vrai moqueur_, while the seriousness of his
demeanour lent a certain piquancy to his paradoxical talk which had a
distinct charm. In this respect, indeed, the caricature of Pater in the
pages of the _New Republic_ gives an entirely wrong impression. In the
_New Republic_ Mr. Rose is made to talk as though he were uttering his
secret thoughts, _dicenda tacenda locutus_, with entire indifference
to the tone of the audience that surrounded him. This is a hopeless
misconception of Pater’s ordinary ways.
There are two or three anecdotes which survive which aptly illustrate
the same tendency. I do not know to what extent these reminiscences are
coloured by the legendary element, but they are contemporary stories
which have survived, and are therefore worth repeating. He was asked,
for instance, whether he did not find his College work a great burden
to him. He replied with inimitable gravity, “Well, not so much as you
might think. The fact is that most of our men are fairly well-to-do,
and it is not necessary that they should learn very much. At some
Colleges I am told that certain of the young men have a genuine love
for learning; if that were so here, it would be quite too dreadful.”
He sighed, and looked sadly at his auditor.
On another occasion it is said that, when advising a man what to read
for Greats, Pater said: “I cannot advise you to read any special books;
the great thing is to read authors _whole_; read Plato _whole_; read
Kant _whole_; read Mill _whole_.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account