The Princess Charlotte--the nation’s hope, so untimely cut off--was
born at Carlton House, but she is more closely connected with Warwick
House, which almost adjoined it on the east side, and stood at the
end of Warwick Street, which still exists. The original Warwick House
had been the birthplace of that Sir Philip Warwick, whose memoirs of
his Royal master, Charles I., are frequently to be met with. When the
Princess Charlotte lived here with her governess, Miss Knight, the
latter states that the entrance was secured by bars of iron on the
inside, and that the Princess was obliged to go through the court
of Carlton House. The same lady gives as dreary an account of the
house, as Fanny Burney did of Kew Palace; it was, she says, “an old
moderate-sized dwelling, at that time miserably out of repair, and
almost falling to ruins.” This was in 1813; in the following year the
Princess, worn out by petty restraints, the coercive measures of the
Prince Regent, and above all her enforced separation from her mother,
escaped from the house and drove in a hackney cab to Queen Caroline’s
then residence in Connaught Place. Hither, however, she returned at
the urgent solicitations of Brougham and the Duke of Sussex; and here,
subsequently, occurred that scene between the Regent and the Princess
and her attendants which forms the subject of a well-known caricature
drawing.
It is difficult to pass by Charing Cross and its manifold memories,
but if we gave way to the temptation, we should find fresh attractions
in Whitehall and the Strand, and I must unwillingly refrain from
penetrating further east. The Haymarket, which we are now going up, and
Piccadilly east, which we shall presently come to, are, however, both
so full of interest that I hope we shall find matter in these “pastures
new” to compensate us.
CHAPTER III.
_THE HAYMARKET, ST. JAMES’S SQUARE, AND PICCADILLY (EAST)._
“_A spacious street of great resort._”--STRYPE.
[Sidenote: THE HAYMARKET.]
The Haymarket is one of those thoroughfares whose names speak for
themselves. To-day, it is true, it has little the appearance of that
which its title indicates, and it is, therefore, all the pleasanter
to find its older uses recalled in its present denomination. The
curious thing is that the St. James’s hay-market, which was held close
by, so early as the days of Elizabeth, should have survived to so
comparatively recently as the reign of William IV.; yet it was not till
1830, that the Act was passed which removed the market to the vicinity
of Regent’s Park. That the Haymarket was long an important thoroughfare
is evidenced by Strype, who calls it “a spacious street of great
resort, full of inns and places of entertainment, especially on the
west side.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account