Social problems; Socialism -- United States; Working class -- United States
But these hereditary inefficients do not alone compose the surplus labor
army. There are the skilled but unsteady and unreliable men; and the old
men, once skilled, but, with dwindling powers, no longer skilled. {3}
And there are good men, too, splendidly skilled and efficient, but thrust
out of the employment of dying or disaster-smitten industries. In this
connection it is not out of place to note the misfortune of the workers
in the British iron trades, who are suffering because of American
inroads. And, last of all, are the unskilled laborers, the hewers of
wood and drawers of water, the ditch-diggers, the men of pick and shovel,
the helpers, lumpers, roustabouts. If trade is slack on a seacoast of
two thousand miles, or the harvests are light in a great interior valley,
myriads of these laborers lie idle, or make life miserable for their
fellows in kindred unskilled employments.
A constant filtration goes on in the working world, and good material is
continually drawn from the surplus labor army. Strikes and industrial
dislocations shake up the workers, bring good men to the surface and sink
men as good or not so good. The hope of the skilled striker is in that
the scabs are less skilled, or less capable of becoming skilled; yet each
strike attests to the efficiency that lurks beneath. After the Pullman
strike, a few thousand railroad men were chagrined to find the work they
had flung down taken up by men as good as themselves.
But one thing must be considered here. Under the present system, if the
weakest and least fit were as strong and fit as the best, and the best
were correspondingly stronger and fitter, the same condition would
obtain. There would be the same army of employed labor, the same army of
surplus labor. The whole thing is relative. There is no absolute
standard of efficiency.
* * * * *
Comes now the tramp. And all conclusions may be anticipated by saying at
once that he is a tramp because some one has to be a tramp. If he left
the "road" and became a _very_ efficient common laborer, some _ordinarily
efficient_ common laborer would have to take to the "road." The nooks
and crannies are crowded by the surplus laborers; and when the first snow
flies, and the tramps are driven into the cities, things become
overcrowded and stringent police regulations are necessary.
The tramp is one of two kinds of men: he is either a discouraged worker
or a discouraged criminal. Now a discouraged criminal, on investigation,
proves to be a discouraged worker, or the descendant of discouraged
workers; so that, in the last analysis, the tramp is a discouraged
worker. Since there is not work for all, discouragement for some is
unavoidable. How, then, does this process of discouragement operate?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account