Social problems; Socialism -- United States; Working class -- United States
In addition to the use of bricks, clubs, and bullets, the selfish laborer
finds it necessary to express his feelings in speech. Just as the
peaceful country-dweller calls the sea-rover a "pirate," and the stout
burgher calls the man who breaks into his strong-box a "robber," so the
selfish laborer applies the opprobrious epithet a "scab" to the laborer
who takes from him food and shelter by being more generous in the
disposal of his labor power. The sentimental connotation of "scab" is as
terrific as that of "traitor" or "Judas," and a sentimental definition
would be as deep and varied as the human heart. It is far easier to
arrive at what may be called a technical definition, worded in commercial
terms, as, for instance, that _a scab is one who gives more value for the
same price than another_.
The laborer who gives more time or strength or skill for the same wage
than another, or equal time or strength or skill for a less wage, is a
scab. This generousness on his part is hurtful to his fellow-laborers,
for it compels them to an equal generousness which is not to their
liking, and which gives them less of food and shelter. But a word may be
said for the scab. Just as his act makes his rivals compulsorily
generous, so do they, by fortune of birth and training, make compulsory
his act of generousness. He does not scab because he wants to scab. No
whim of the spirit, no burgeoning of the heart, leads him to give more of
his labor power than they for a certain sum.
It is because he cannot get work on the same terms as they that he is a
scab. There is less work than there are men to do work. This is patent,
else the scab would not loom so large on the labor-market horizon.
Because they are stronger than he, or more skilled, or more energetic, it
is impossible for him to take their places at the same wage. To take
their places he must give more value, must work longer hours or receive a
smaller wage. He does so, and he cannot help it, for his will "to live"
is driving him on as well as they are being driven on by their will "to
live"; and to live he must win food and shelter, which he can do only by
receiving permission to work from some man who owns a bit of land or a
piece of machinery. And to receive permission from this man, he must
make the transaction profitable for him.
Viewed in this light, the scab, who gives more labor power for a certain
price than his fellows, is not so generous after all. He is no more
generous with his energy than the chattel slave and the convict laborer,
who, by the way, are the almost perfect scabs. They give their labor
power for about the minimum possible price. But, within limits, they may
loaf and malinger, and, as scabs, are exceeded by the machine, which
never loafs and malingers and which is the ideally perfect scab.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account