This area below the little finger, or what we referred to as the ulnar portion of the palm--now, in making the examination or comparison, here again--first of all I would like to point out that there is a black line that goes right through--in an upward fashion--through the enlargement of the latent fingerprint. That line is caused by virtue of the fact that the palmprint which is developed is partially on a piece of tape as well as the wrapper itself. In other words, a part of the print is on a piece of tape and the other part is on the paper itself. Mr. EISENBERG. Mr. Latona, could you show how the palm lay on the paper to produce that impression? Mr. LATONA. The palm lay in this fashion here. Mr. EISENBERG. You are putting your right hand on the paper so that the fingers are pointing in the same direction as the arrow A? Mr. LATONA. That's right. Mr. EISENBERG. And it is at approximately right angles to the paper bag? Mr. LATONA. That's right. Here again, in making the comparison, a check is made for the location of certain points. Now, we notice here that the points appear to be much closer than they were in the fingerprint, and that is probably because of the pressure which was exercised, possibly in holding the object which was in this paper container. Now, you notice this point No. 1 here, which we term the ending ridge. Point No. 2 is also an ending ridge. And you notice in between these points there is a ridge. Point No. 2 is to the left of point No. 1. Then we find there is a point No. 3 which is a point which is similar in character to point No. 2 and is almost directly below, but there are two intervening ridges. Then there is a point No. 4 which is below point No. 3, and going in a direction opposite from point No. 3. If we bear those four points in mind--and if the latent palmprint was made by the same palm that made the inked palmprint--then we should find these four points in that position over there. Now, in order to first of all find the particular area where we would look to see if those points exist, we would bear in mind the general formation of the print itself. We notice the so-called looping formation in the inked print. We see that there is a looping formation here. Definitely it is not as pronounced in the latent print as it is in the inked print. But to the experienced eye, it is right here. Accordingly, bearing in mind where these points would occur, we would generalize in the area to the extreme right of the enlargement, and find that there is a point which is somewhat similar to the point which appears in the inked impression, which momentarily we would say appears to be the same point as No. 1. Now, bearing in mind how No. 2 is related to point No. 1, does such a point appear in the latent print? And making the check, exactly in the same fashion and relationship that occurred in the inked print, we find that there is such a point.