Mr. EISENBERG. Mr. Latona, now you are showing me another photograph which appears to be a photograph of the lift itself, Exhibit 637, but an enlargement thereof? Mr. LATONA. Slightly enlarged; yes, sir. Mr. EISENBERG. Was this prepared by you or under your supervision? Mr. LATONA. It was. Mr. EISENBERG. And there is a red circle around this, on this photograph, that is around the print, the latent print? Mr. LATONA. That is right. Mr. EISENBERG. Mr. Chairman, may I have this photograph admitted as 639? Representative FORD. It shall be admitted. (The photograph referred to was marked Commission Exhibit No. 639, and received in evidence.) Mr. EISENBERG. Mr. Latona, did you also prepare a chart showing an enlarged portion of the inked and latent palmprint? Mr. LATONA. Yes, sir; I did. Mr. EISENBERG. Illustrating some of the points which you used in making your identification? Mr. LATONA. Yes, sir; I did. Mr. EISENBERG. Was this chart prepared by you or under your supervision? Mr. LATONA. This was prepared under my direct supervision. Mr. EISENBERG. May I have this admitted as 640? Representative FORD. It shall be admitted. (The chart referred to was marked Commission Exhibit No. 640, and received in evidence.) Mr. EISENBERG. What is the enlargement of this chart? Mr. LATONA. Approximately an eight-time enlargement of the latent print which appears on the lift, Commission Exhibit---- Mr. EISENBERG. 637? Mr. LATONA. 637. And the inked right palmprint enlargement is approximately eight times an enlargement of the Exhibit 638. Mr. EISENBERG. The inked print? Mr. LATONA. Which is encircled in red, a portion of that area. Mr. EISENBERG. I wonder whether you could put that up on this easel here so that we can all see it, and explain to us some of the points which led you to your conclusion. Mr. LATONA. Here again the approach insofar as making a comparison is concerned is exactly the same. That never changes. In making a comparison of fingerprints or palmprints, the mechanics are exactly the same. First to look for what might be considered as points which are easy to see to the fingerprint man. Representative FORD. May I ask first was the lift a good print for technical purposes? Mr. LATONA. Yes; to the extent that the identification was made. There is no question as to the identity. Now, insofar as quality is concerned, I believe that is what you have in mind, we don't, in fingerprint circles, don't say that this is a good latent as compared to a bad latent. If it is valuable for purposes of identification, so far as we are concerned it is good. Now, that may not appear to the inexperienced eye possibly as being as clear as some of those others which you have already seen, but for the purpose of identification the points are here. That is the main thing.