Mr. RANKIN. Yes; we could do that for you. Mr. DULLES. Then we could have this available possibly at a later date just to check over the other items against your files to see if there is any information there that we really need. The CHAIRMAN. You could come back, couldn't you, Mr. Belmont? Mr. BELMONT. I am at your disposal. The CHAIRMAN. I think that would be better. I think, Mr. Rankin, your purpose is entirely laudable here, but I think we do have to use some discretion in the matter, and you say that you want it so we can say we have seen everything. Well, the same people who would demand that we see everything of this kind would also demand that they be entitled to see it, and if it is security matters we can't let them see it. It has to go back to the FBI without their scrutiny. So unless, I would say, unless there is something that we think here is vital to this situation, that it isn't necessary for us to see the whole file, particularly in view of the fact that we have practically--we have all the reports, he says we have all the reports that are in that file, and it just seems like thrashing old straw to go over it and over it again. Mr. McCLOY. Do we have copies of all these telegrams that are in here from the Embassy? Mr. BELMONT. You are looking at---- Mr. McCLOY. Not Embassy; here is one from Mexico. Do we have that? We don't have these in our files, for example. Mr. BELMONT. This is subsequent to the assassination. You see your area of interest at this point is information, all information we had prior to the assassination. I did not remove from this file the items that started to come in subsequent to the assassination, you see. Mr. McCLOY. My feeling is that somebody on the Commission should examine that file. I can't come to any other conclusion after reading it all, because I don't know what is in it, what is in our record, and what is in that file. There is a good bit of material there that is narrative, which I think would be relevant. Certainly, I don't believe we can be possibly criticized for deleting or not producing a file which contains the type of information that you are speaking of. We are just as interested in protecting the security of your investigative processes as you are. But I don't think that when it is on the record that we have this file, that may contain material that was not in our files, and we are given the opportunity to examine it, without disclosing these confidential matters that we ought not to have somebody go through it. Mr. DULLES. I agree with that but I think we could save time if we checked off first what we have already and that would cut out about half of that file probably. Mr. McCLOY. I think in a rapid glance through it, I think just about half of it. The CHAIRMAN. Well, suppose you do that then, get those and let's see. All right, proceed, Mr. Stern. Mr. STERN. I think perhaps we ought to leave the entire matter of the file then until we can give you the information.