Warren Commission (13 of 26): Hearings Vol. XIII (of 15)United States. Warren Commission
History
Warren Commission (13 of 26): Hearings Vol. XIII (of 15)
United States. Warren Commission
Kennedy, John F. (John Fitzgerald), 1917-1963 -- Assassination; Oswald, Lee Harvey
Mr. HUBERT. Mr. McKinzie, my name is Leon Hubert, I am a member of the
advisory staff of the general counsel of the President’s Commission
on the assassination of President Kennedy. Under the provisions of
the President’s Executive Order 11130, dated November 29, 1963, a
Joint Resolution of Congress, No. 137, and the rules of procedure
adopted by the Commission in conformance with an Executive order in
that resolution, I have been authorized to take a sworn deposition
of you, Mr. McKinzie. I state to you now that the general nature of
the Commission’s inquiry is to ascertain, evaluate, and report upon
the facts relating to the assassination of President Kennedy and the
subsequent violent death of Lee Oswald. In particular to you, Mr.
McKinzie, the nature of the inquiry today is to determine what facts
you know about the death of Oswald and any other pertinent facts
you may know about the general inquiry. Now, Mr. McKinzie, you have
appeared here today by virtue of the fact that the members of the
Secret Service contacted you to locate you and ask you to come, is that
correct?
Mr. McKINZIE. That’s correct.
Mr. HUBERT. You have not yet received the letter addressed to you
by Mr. J. Lee Rankin, that you would be asked to come here, is that
correct?
Mr. McKINZIE. That’s correct.
Mr. HUBERT. I see that the copy of the letter that I have was addressed
to 321 Harmon Street, Dallas, Tex. That is not your address. Your
address was 3321 Harmon, so, they left out one 3 there. There was also
a copy of a letter sent to the Dallas Public Works Department addressed
to you that you didn’t receive.
Mr. McKINZIE. I didn’t receive that.
Mr. HUBERT. Let me say that under the rules adopted by the Commission,
you are entitled to a 3-day written notice prior to the taking of this
deposition. As I told you, we sent out the letter with the hope that it
would be received, but apparently you have not received it. The rules,
however, provide that any witness may waive the 3-day notice if he
wishes to do so. Are you willing to waive the 3-day notice?
Mr. McKINZIE. Probably, I don’t quite understand there what you mean.
Mr. HUBERT. In other words, you could, if you want to say now, “I’ll
come in when I get the letter.”
Mr. McKINZIE. I see. I see. Well, not necessary.
Mr. HUBERT. If you want to. It is just a waiving of nothing else but
the notice.
Mr. McKINZIE. In other words, since I am here, I’d just as soon not do
that. I mean, I’d just as soon answer your questions.
Mr. HUBERT. You are waiving nothing else but the notice that the rules
of procedure adopted by the Commission say that you are entitled to.
Mr. McKINZIE. Yes.
Mr. HUBERT. If you feel that you would just as soon go ahead now and
not come back 3 days after you get the letter, then you are willing to
waive it, is that correct?
Mr. McKINZIE. That’s right.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account