Turbines were decided upon because it was held that their adoption
conferred certain advantages which more than counterbalanced their
disadvantages. Compared with reciprocating engines, they were said
to be lighter, to have a less number of working parts, to work more
smoothly and be more easily manipulated, and to be less liable to
breakdown. They were claimed also to show a saving in coal consumption
at high powers, and to require less boiler-room space and a smaller
number of engineers to look after them. Another important consideration
was that turbines could be placed lower in the ship. The point
which chiefly occupied the committee was the question of providing
sufficient stopping and turning power for quick and easy manœuvring. A
series of experiments with pairs of sister ships, fitted respectively
with reciprocating and turbine engines, and also at the Admiralty
experimental works at Haslar, influenced the Admiralty in their
decision in favour of turbines. The _Dreadnought’s_ bunker capacity is
2,700 tons, with which she could steam 5,800 sea miles at economical
speed, or 3,500 sea miles at 18½ knots, due allowance being made for
extra consumption in bad weather, and for a small quantity being left
in the bunkers. Oil fuel was not taken into account in estimating the
ship’s radius of action, but a considerable quantity was arranged
for and would, of course, greatly increase her effectiveness in this
respect.
Another innovation in this remarkable ship was in the rearrangement of
the principal officers’ quarters. Hitherto they had been accommodated
as far as possible from the conning tower, where their most important
duties were performed, but in this ship the admiral’s and captain’s
quarters are placed on the main deck forward, near the conning tower.
The officers’ quarters also are placed forward, both on the main deck
and on the upper deck. Ample accommodation for the remainder of the
crew is available on the main and lower decks aft.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account