The earliest guns were simply tubes, not cast, but built of strips of
iron or wood held together by rings. They were breech-loaders, the
charge being placed in a loosely-fitting chamber. How the chamber was
secured and the gun fired are still undecided. The guns were usually
innocent of trunnions and were fastened lengthwise upon wooden beams
which could be propped up to give them the desired elevation. It has
been recorded that in one of the earliest siege operations at which
this primitive artillery was employed, both sides were so interested
in the operation of firing that they ceased exchanging missiles
and defiance, and even stopped their personal combats, until after
the discharge, when, being much relieved that the stone bullet had
inflicted no damage on the assailed castle wall and had wounded no one,
they resumed hostilities in the old-fashioned way. In those days one
discharge per gun per diem was regarded as sufficient. It was customary
to load the piece overnight and fire it in the morning, from which it
may be surmised that its moral effects were greater than the material
destruction caused. Artillery would have to be in a more advanced
stage to justify its use at sea, for no vessels could afford to carry
guns which could only be used so infrequently. Nevertheless, the moral
effects of gunfire were so evident, especially when weapons were made
more powerful and able to inflict serious material damage, that the
adoption of the new arm for naval war could not be long delayed, and
the time soon arrived when both national and private vessels of any
size carried one gun or more. By the middle of the fifteenth century
guns on board ship had become common.
The illustration of the model[14] of a ship of the period 1486-1520
gives a very good idea of what the warships of that time were like.
Although the vessel carried guns, the bow and arrow were still relied
upon. The archer’s panier on the mast had given place to the deep
circular top. Castles, however, were provided fore and aft for the
archers, and were useful alike for affording them protection and
accommodation and a place of vantage whence to discharge their arrows.
The vessel is of the same type as the Spanish caravel of the early
sixteenth century. From this it may be inferred that the Spaniards went
to the north for the designs of their hulls, but preferred to retain
the rig with which they were most familiar, the Spaniards depending
largely on lateen yards and sails, whereas the model is square-rigged
but without the top-sails she ought to carry.
A feature of the sea-going Atlantic vessels of this time was
their great beam in proportion to their length. They also had an
extraordinary amount of “tumble home,” or sloping of the sides above
the water line towards each other. Ships of the type represented by
the model were much in advance of those upon which artillery was first
carried.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account