Washington, its sights and insights [1909] — John Shaqi
Washington, its sights and insights [1909]Monroe, Harriet Earhart
History
Washington, its sights and insights [1909]
Monroe, Harriet Earhart
Washington (D.C.) -- Description and travel
faculties of the youthful mind and how new energies are evolved by
repeated action; or, perhaps, with patriotic emotion, he was reflecting
upon the future destinies of his country, and on the rising generation,
upon whom these future destinies must devolve; or, most probably, with a
sentiment of moral and religious feeling, he was collecting an argument
which, characteristic of himself, no art would 'be able to elude, and no
force to resist.' Our traveler remained a spectator, and took no part in
what was said.
"At last one of the young men, remarking that it was impossible to
combat with long and established prejudices, wheeled around, and, with
some familiarity, exclaimed, "Well, my old gentleman, what do you think
of these things?" If, said the traveler, a streak of vivid lightning had
at the moment crossed the room, their amazement could not have been
greater than it was with what followed. The most eloquent and
unanswerable appeal that he ever heard or read was made for nearly an
hour by the old gentleman. So perfect was his recollection that every
argument urged against the Christian religion was met in the order in
which it was advanced. Hume's sophistry on the subject of miracles was,
if possible, more perfectly answered than it had already been done by
Campbell. And in the whole lecture there was so much simplicity and
energy, pathos and sublimity, that not another word was uttered. An
attempt to describe it, said the traveler, would be an attempt to paint
the sunbeams. It was now a matter of curiosity and inquiry who the old
gentleman was. The traveler concluded it was a preacher from whom the
pulpit eloquence was heard. But no; it was the Chief Justice of the
United States."
Judge Marshall was followed by Roger Brooke Taney, of Maryland. He was
nominated by President Jackson, and confirmed by the Senate in 1836. He
died October 12, 1864. His decision in the Dred Scott fugitive case may
be ranked as one of the factors which brought about the Civil War. The
case was substantially this: A negro slave, with a wife and two
children, sued his master for freedom under the plea that, having been
taken North into free States a number of times, they were therefore
entitled to freedom. The decision covers many pages, but the nation
summed it up in these words: "The black man possesses no rights which
the white man is bound to respect." Since Moses established a judiciary
no decision ever made such a disturbance. In the memory of most people
Taney's singularly pure life goes for nothing beside the infamy of this
decision. It outraged the conscience of mankind. Taney claimed that he
did not make the law, he simply gave its interpretation. The decision
was approved by the majority of the court, but he alone was made to
suffer the obloquy which followed.
This decision proved sufficient to bring down the wrath of a just God on
a nation so lost to human justice. The South suffered for the sin of
slavery, the North for conniving thereto.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account