Water Reptiles of the Past and PresentWilliston, Samuel Wendell
Science
Water Reptiles of the Past and Present
Williston, Samuel Wendell
Aquatic reptiles; Aquatic reptiles, Fossil
Of the limbs, only a few bones are known, but these are very
instructive. The arm bones, as shown in Fig. 84, are strikingly like
those of the mosasaurs, as will be seen by comparing the figure on p.
157. The humerus is a little more elongated than that of the mosasaurs,
more nearly like the mosasaurian femur. The shoulder-blade and the
coracoid are imperfectly ossified, as is seen from the figure—another
characteristic of aquatic life. What the fingers and toes were like
cannot be said; probably they were bound together by membrane, forming
swimming paddles similar to those of the mosasaurs. Some of the bones
referred to the pelvis are known, but it is not known whether they are
united to the spinal column by a sacrum, as in land animals. Nor is
anything certainly known of the hind leg or much of the tail. Since the
front legs show marked aquatic adaptations, it is altogether certain
that the hind legs will be found to be modified more or less, though
not so much modified as the front legs, because, as we have seen, the
front legs are always more specialized in aquatic animals than the
hind ones, even as the hind legs are more specialized than the front
ones in land animals. Possibly the hind legs will be found to be more
like those of the Thalattosuchia, as shown on p. 212, that is, partly
terrestrial in character. Doubtless the tail was long and flattened,
possibly with a terminal fin-like dilation, though this is less
probable.
As regards the habits and food of the thalattosaurs, no better summary
can be given than that of Professor Merriam, in his own words:
The remains of thalattosaurs are known only in purely marine
deposits containing little or no material of terrestrial
origin. They are associated with a fauna consisting of
numerous forms, both vertebrate and invertebrate, which
are not known to have existed away from marine areas. In
the structure of the skeleton we find the abbreviated and
broadened proximal segments of the limbs, the slender snout
with prehensile terminal teeth, and the median superior
nostrils, indicating a purely aquatic type. There can
scarcely be room for doubt that the thalattosaurs as a group
were typical marine forms. The larger and more specialized
species comprised in the genus _Thalattosaurus_ were
strictly natatory. They may have visited the shore, but,
like the plesiosaurs, were better fitted for swimming
than for crawling. Of the smaller _Nectosaurus_
we unfortunately do not know the limbs. They may have
been considerably less specialized, and the animal
to a correspondingly greater degree a shore-dweller.
_Nectosaurus_ is, however, found in the same deposits
with other forms and appears to be as common as the others;
so that it is safe to consider it as having passed the
greater part of its life away from the shore.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account