He showed no vigor in following up his victory at Ligny, and made
a capital error in not breaking up the retreating foe with cavalry
charges.
He lost a great opportunity at Quatre Bras.
On the night of the 17th he should have sent definite orders to
Grouchy, and should have hearkened to Soult when he was urged by that
thorough soldier to call in at least a portion of Grouchy’s force.
He took the reports of Haxo and Ney, and based the battle upon their
erroneous reports. The Napoleon of earlier years would have _gone to
see for himself_.
He did not have a good view of the field and consequently missed
detailed movements of immense importance.
He treated with too much scorn the opinion of Soult and Reillé (who
had tested the English soldier in Spain), when they warned him that
the English, properly posted and properly handled--as Wellington could
handle them--were invincible.
He made the attack without maneuvering, in just the bare-breasted,
full-face way that best lent itself to bloody repulse.
The premature cavalry movement which contributed most to the
final disaster was under full headway,--too far advanced to be
stopped,--before he knew that it was contemplated.
In holding off the Prussians, the Emperor displayed his genius,
directing every movement himself. On the field of Waterloo, he left too
much to Ney and Jerome. Had he taken Ney out of the fight at the time
that he recalled Jerome, the issue might have been different.
The last grand charge should not have been made at all. He should have
stopped, as Lee did at Gettysburg, in time to save his army, for by
this time he _knew_ that Grouchy would not come. To stake so much on
one last desperate throw was the act of a man who was no longer what
he had been at Aspern and Essling when he withdrew into the Island of
Lobau.
When the Emperor was giving the order for the last great charge,
General Haxo would have remonstrated. “But, Sire--” he began. Napoleon
flapped his glove lightly across Haxo’s face and said, “Hold your
tongue, my friend. There is Grouchy who will give us other news.” He
had mistaken Bülow’s cannonade for Grouchy’s.
One can understand what was passing in his mind when he said to
Gourgaud, a few weeks later, “Ah, if it were to be done over again!”
On Wellington’s side the management was superb. It was practically
faultless. He made the most of every advantage, and made the most of
the errors of his enemy.
With this exception: He left 18,000 of his men at Hal, four or five
miles away, protecting a road which he feared the French might take.
But with Napoleon facing him, here at Mont-Saint-Jean, the 18,000 men
were no longer needed at Hal; and no one has ever been able to explain
why Wellington did not call them in during the early morning of the
18th.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account