"We" : $b The famous flier's own story of his life and his trans-Atlantic flight, together with his views on the future of aviation — John Shaqi
"We" : $b The famous flier's own story of his life and his trans-Atlantic flight, together with his views on the future of aviationLindbergh, Charles A. (Charles Augustus)
History
"We" : $b The famous flier's own story of his life and his trans-Atlantic flight, together with his views on the future of aviation
Lindbergh, Charles A. (Charles Augustus)
Aeronautics -- Flights; Air pilots -- Biography; Transatlantic flights
I had been warned before leaving the field, that the airline course to
Texas was over some of the “worst flying country in the south” and had
been advised to take either a northern course directly to Minnesota or
to follow the Gulf of Mexico. This advice served to create a desire
to find out what the “worst flying country in the south” looked like.
I had a great deal of confidence in my Jenny with its powerful OX-5
engine, and it seemed absurd to me at that time to detour by airplane.
Consequently I laid my route in the most direct line possible to
conform with my limited cruising range with forty gallons of fuel.
The flight to Montgomery was uneventful. I landed at the army field
there before noon, filled the fuel tanks and took-off again for
Meridian, Mississippi.
I arrived over Meridian in late afternoon and for the first time was
faced with the problem of finding a suitable field and landing in it.
An experienced pilot can see at a glance nearly everything necessary
to know about a landing field. He can tell its size, the condition of
the ground, height of grass or weeds, whether there are any rocks,
holes, posts or ditches in the way, if the land is rough and rolling or
flat and smooth; in short whether the field is suitable to land in or
if it would be advisable to look for another and better one. In fact,
the success of a barnstorming pilot of the old days was measured to a
large extent by his artfulness in the choice of fields from which to
operate. Often, in case of motor failure, the safety of his passengers,
himself, and his ship depended upon his alertness in choosing the best
available landing place and his ability in maneuvering the plane into
it. If his motor failure was only partial or at high altitude, time was
not so essential, as a plane can glide a great distance, either with a
motor which only “revs” down a couple of hundred R.P.M. or without any
assistance from the engine at all. The average wartime machine could
glide at least five times its height, which meant that if it was five
thousand feet above the ground the pilot could pick a field to land
in five miles away with safety; but if the failure was soon after the
take-off, then instant decision and immediate action were necessary.
An amateur, on the other hand, has not overcome the strangeness of
altitude, and the ground below looks entirely different than it does
from the air, although there is not the sensation, in an airplane, of
looking down as from a high building. Hills appear as flat country,
boulders and ditches are invisible, sizes are deceptive and marshes
appear as solid grassland. The student has not the background of
experience so essential to the successful pilot, yet his only method of
learning lies in his own initiative in meeting and overcoming service
conditions.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account