Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, ShropshireTyerman, L. (Luke)
Religion
Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, Shropshire
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Fletcher, John, 1729-1785
“Mr. Wesley assured us he had corrected all the _tart_ expressions in
them” (that is, in Fletcher’s Letters). “Alas! _Qualia verba, quæ
facta!_ Whether there are _no tart_ expressions in the Letters, let
every one that hath seen them judge. But, perhaps, this learned
gentleman distinguishes between the _tart_ and the _bitter_. If all
the _tart_ expressions are corrected, I am sure there are enough of
the _bitter_ left.
“As to the Letters themselves, I shall have ‘the author’s’ pardon for
noticing two particular charges against me.
“1. I am supposed to want candour; as if I had put a forced
construction on the ‘Minutes,’ in order to bring Mr. Wesley in guilty.
Mr. Fletcher has attempted a ‘vindication’ of them; and, by breaking
them into sentences and half-sentences, and refining upon each of
these detached particles, he has done more than I could have expected,
even from his great abilities, in giving a new turn to the whole. But,
after reading his learned and elaborate ‘Vindication,’ when I cast my
eye over the ‘Minutes,’ and consider the whole as it stands in
context, I must own, I am just where I was: nothing _but the
‘Declaration’_ could ever convince me that justification by works was
not maintained and supported by the ‘Minutes.’
“2. The charge of _inconsistency_ is supported by quotations from my
sermons. To this, I beg leave to observe, that the passages quoted are
not altogether in point; neither do they maintain justification by
works in such direct and express terms as the ‘Minutes’ appear to do.
I must, however, own that they savour too strongly of mysticism and
free-will; and all I can say, on my behalf in this respect, is, that
they were written many years ago, at a time when I had more zeal than
light; that my present ministry, as well as my present way of
thinking, is very different; and that I have frequently expressed my
disapprobation of those sermons, nay wished they had been burnt.”
Shirley was nettled; and, after the imperious arrogance displayed in his
“Circular Letter,” he deserved to be. Fletcher’s fifth and last letter
is caustical; but not more so than the occasion justified. The following
is extracted from it:—
“HON. AND REV. SIR,—Having vindicated both some important doctrines of
the Gospel, and an eminent servant of Christ from the charge of
_dreadful heresy_, I will now take the liberty of a friend to
expostulate a little with _you_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account