Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, ShropshireTyerman, L. (Luke)
Religion
Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, Shropshire
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Fletcher, John, 1729-1785
“When Brutus, among other senators, rushed upon Cæsar, the venerable
general said, ‘Art thou also among them? Even thou, my son?’ May not
Mr. Wesley address you, Sir, in the same words, and add, ‘If a body of
men must be raised to attack me, let some zealous follower of Dr.
Crisp, some hot-headed vindicator of reprobation and eternal
justification blow the trumpet, and put himself at their head; but let
it not be _you_, who believe with me that we are moral agents; that
God is love; that Jesus tasted death for every man; and that the Holy
Spirit shall not always strive with sinners. If you do not regard my
reputation, consider at least your own, and expose me not as a heretic
for advancing propositions, the substance of which you have avowed
before the sun.’
“But had those propositions, at length, appeared to you unsound, yea,
and had you never maintained them yourself, should you not, as a
Christian and a brother, have wrote to Mr. Wesley, acquainted him with
your objections, and desired him to solve them and explain himself, or
you should be obliged publicly to expose him?
“Was this condescension more than was due from you, Sir, and our other
friends, to a grey-headed minister of Christ, an old general in the
armies of Emmanuel, a father who has children capable of instructing
even masters in Israel, and one whom God made the first and principal
instrument of the late revival of internal religion in our Church?
“Instead of this friendly method, as if you were a Barak, _commanded
by the Lord God of Israel_, you call _together the children of
Naphthali and Zebulun_: you convene, from England and Wales, clergy
and laity, Churchmen and Dissenters, to meet you at Bristol, where
they are, it seems, to be entertained in good and free quarters. And
for what grand expedition? Why, on a day appointed, you are to march
up _in a body_, not to attack Sisera and his iron chariots, but an old
Caleb, who, without meddling with you, quietly goes on to the conquest
of Canaan; not to desire, in a friendly manner, after a fair debate of
every proposition that appears dangerous, and, upon previous
conviction, that what is exceptionable may be given up; but to do what
I think was never done by nominal, much less by _real Protestants_. O
let it not be told in Rome, lest the sons of the Inquisition rejoice!
This mixed, this formidable body is to _insist upon_ Mr. Wesley and
the preachers in his connexion, _formally recanting_ their ‘Minutes,’
as _appearing injurious to the very fundamental principles of
Christianity_, and being _dreadfully heretical_. And this,
astonishing! without the least inquiry made into their meaning and
design, without a shadow of authority from our superiors in Church or
State, without an appeal _to the law and to the testimony_, without
form of process, without judge or jury, without so much as allowing
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account