Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, ShropshireTyerman, L. (Luke)
Religion
Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, Shropshire
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Fletcher, John, 1729-1785
“God alone knows the sorrow of heart wherewith I address you; and how
much the fear of casting stumbling-blocks before some who are really
sincere, and the apprehensions of giving malicious joy to others who
desire no greater satisfaction than to see the children of the Prince
of Peace divided among themselves, had well-nigh prevailed upon me to
pour out my soul in silence instead of publicly taking up the pen
against you. But when I perceived the solicitude with which Mr.
Wesley’s preachers recommended your letters to Mr. Shirley in their
respective congregations, and, above all, how many of God’s people had
been perplexed and distressed by reading them,—I say, when I perceived
this to be the case, and had prayed to the Giver of all wisdom for
direction, I could not but esteem it my indispensable duty to send out
a few observations on your book, especially as no other person, that I
know of, had made any reply to the doctrinal parts of it from the time
of its publication. With regard to the ‘_Circular Letter_,’ I shall
studiously avoid the very mention of it; as whether the sending of it
were in itself a wrong step or a right one, is of no consequence in
the matter of salvation. Neither shall I follow you page by page, but
taking the ’Minutes’ in the order they stand, shall dwell upon them,
more or less, as appears necessary.”
The plan here propounded is carried out, but want of space renders it
impossible to give an outline of Mr. Hill’s theology. The following
quotations must be taken as specimens of others which might be given:—
“Your argument is this; that, ‘_believing is previous to
justification_.’ But, dear Sir, this is begging the question; and,
permit me to say, that I deny the assertion. Waving all disputes
concerning eternal justification, or justification in the mind and
purpose of God, I maintain, that, believing cannot possibly be
previous to justification; and you must yourself maintain the same,
unless you will adopt the phrase of _an unjustified believer_; whereas
the Holy Ghost teaches that _all who believe are justified_. We may as
well suppose that a man eats before he takes any food, and that he
sees before he receives the light of the sun, as that he believes
before he is justified: for believing, and feeding upon Christ, are
not more inseparably connected than eating and taking bodily food, or
than seeing and receiving light are inseparably connected. Yea, true
faith can no more subsist without its object Christ, than there can be
a marriage without a husband. From hence, I conclude, that the
doctrine of believing before justification, and thereby making the
grace of faith a conditional work, is not less contrary to reason than
it is to Scripture itself.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account