Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, ShropshireTyerman, L. (Luke)
Religion
Wesley's Designated Successor: The Life, Letters, and Literary Labours of the Rev. John William Fletcher, Vicar of Madeley, Shropshire
Tyerman, L. (Luke)
Fletcher, John, 1729-1785
“I most sincerely abhor the Minute, ‘that we are every hour and every
moment pleasing or displeasing to God, according to our works;
according to the whole of our inward tempers, and our outward
behaviour;’ and, yet, I equally abhor the assertion, ‘that David did
not _displease_ God more when he committed adultery with Bathsheba,
and imbrued his hands in her husband’s blood, than when he danced
before the ark.’ I know, from Scripture authority, that when David
committed the sin you allude to, the thing which he had done
_displeased the Lord_. But, though I believe that David’s _sin_
displeased the Lord, must I therefore believe that David’s _person_
came under the curse of the law? and that, because he was ungrateful,
God, whose gifts and callings are without repentance, was unfaithful?
Surely no. David was still a son, though a perverse one. Like
backsliding Ephraim, he was still a pleasant child, though he went on
frowardly.”
“Either Christ has fulfilled the whole law, and borne the curse, or He
has not. If He has not, no soul can ever be saved; if He has, then all
debts and claims against His people, be they more or be they less, be
they small or be they great, be they before or be they after
conversion, are for ever and for ever cancelled. All trespasses are
forgiven them. They are justified from all things. They already have
everlasting life. They are now (virtually) sat down in heavenly places
with Christ their Forerunner; and as soon shall Satan pluck His crown
from His head, as His purchase from His hand.”
Such were some of the absurd and pernicious doctrines propounded by Mr.
Hill, and which Fletcher felt it his duty to refute. Towards Wesley,
there is, in Mr. Hill’s pamphlet, an occasional stroke of bitterness,
as, for instance, where he asserts that “there is a much nearer
resemblance between the doctrines of Mr. John Wesley and mother Church”,
(Popery) “than the popish Superior chose to acknowledge;”[263] but
towards Fletcher, Mr. Hill, throughout, displays the most respectful
kindness, and concludes his fifth and last letter thus:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account