After this it will little avail Father Gerard to produce arguments in
support of the proposition that the story of the plot was contrived by
the Government as long as this burning record is allowed to stand.
Fawkes here clearly takes the whole terrible design, with the exception
of the incident of the mine, on his own shoulders. He may have lied to
save his friends; he certainly would not lie to save Salisbury.
So far, however, there is no proof that Salisbury was not long ago
cognisant of the plot through one of the active conspirators. Yet, in
that case, it might be supposed that the accounts that he gave of his
discoveries would be less dependent than they were on the partial
revelations which came in day by day. There is, however, no hint of
superior knowledge in the draft of a letter intended to be sent by
Salisbury to Sir Thomas Parry, the English ambassador in Paris, and
dated on November 6, the day after that on which Fawkes's first
examination was taken:
Sir Thomas Parry, it hath pleased Almighty God, out of his singular
goodness, to bring to light the most cruel and detestable practice
against the person of his Majesty and the whole estate of this
realm, that ever was conceived by the heart of man at any time or
in any place whatsoever, by which practice there was intended not
only the extirpation of the King's Majesty and his issue royal, but
the whole subversion and downfal of this estate, the plot being to
take away at an instant the King, Queen, Prince, Council, Nobility,
Clergy, Judges, and the principal gentlemen of this realm, as they
should have been yesterday altogether assembled at the Parliament
House, in Westminster, the 5th of November, being Tuesday. The
means how to have compassed so great an act, was not to be
performed by strength of men or outward violence, for that might
have be espied and prevented in time; but by a secret conveying of
a great quantity of gunpowder into a vault under the Upper House of
Parliament, and so to have blown up all at a clap, if God out of
his mercy and his just revenge against so great an abomination had
not destined it to be discovered, though very miraculously even
some twelve hours before the matter should have been put into
execution. The person that was the principal undertaker of it, is
one Johnson, a Yorkshire man, and servant to one Thomas Percy, a
gentleman pensioner to his Majesty, and a near kinsman and a
special confidant to the Earl of Northumberland. This Percy had
about a year and a half ago hired a part of Whynniard's house in
the old palace, from whence he had access into this vault to lay
his wood and coal, and as it seemeth now, taken this place of
purpose to work some mischief in a fit time. He is a Papist by
profession, and so is this his man Johnson, a desperate fellow,
whom of late years he took into his service.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account