7. There is an ample supply of money available for purposes of true charity. Does not true charity consist in refusing to give alms to those who can or may support themselves? Is it better to give alms to those people in their attic, or to give alms to them under the conditions of the almshouse? Which course would be most sure to pauperize them utterly? 8. The use of the term "slave" implies a slave-owner and a slave-driver. In this series of (1) _the manufacturer_, (2) _the sweater or middleman_, and (3) _the working-woman with her children_, which is the slave-owner and which is the slave-driver? Under what authority does the slave-master force this woman to render her labor for all that it is worth? 9. If her work is worth more than she gets, can she not get it? A little inquiry into the condition of the clothing trade, and some examination of the fact, might disclose to you that the poor sewing-woman is poor because she sews poorly, and that there is always a scarcity of skilful and intelligent sewing-women, at full wages. My final question is, how do you propose to help those who are incapable of helping themselves, without pauperizing them yet more than they are pauperized under their present conditions? What will you do when you have destroyed the house and done away with the sweater? Are you justified, as a Christian minister, in creating a prejudice and arousing malignant passion by the use of the term "_slave_?" Can you defend or justify this term, under the conditions that are reported, as they are stated in the printed report of your sermon? I venture to put these questions to you because I think that the dangerous class in this community is to be found among persons who, without intelligence, create animosity, and by their method of preaching tend to retard rather than to promote the progress of the poor and ignorant in this country. Very sincerely yours, ***** III. REPLY TO A CRITICISM ON "THE WHITE SLAVES OF BOSTON SWEATERS". "Freedom's secret wilt thou know?-- Counsel not with flesh and blood; Loiter not for cloak or food; Eight thou feelest, rush to do." --RALPH WALDO EMERSON: _Freedom_. Among the scores of thankful letters which I have received, commenting on the discourse on "The White Slaves of the Boston Sweaters," there is one of an entirety different character, written by a distinguished writer on social questions, a gentleman for whom I have always entertained the highest respect. I should be very glad to give the name of the author of this letter; but as it is marked "personal," I cannot, in honor, do so.