Whitehall : $b historical and architectural notes — John Shaqi
Whitehall : $b historical and architectural notesLoftie, W. J. (William John)
History
Whitehall : $b historical and architectural notes
Loftie, W. J. (William John)
Architecture -- England -- London; Whitehall (London, England) -- History
This fact—for it is not merely an opinion—seems to answer a question
that is often asked: Did the coolness of Charles on that last day
at Westminster Hall, and again on the scaffold at Whitehall, betray
any feeling, any certainty that he would be respited or rescued? A
moment’s thought dispels the idea. Charles was manly, dignified,
truthful before Bradshaw and before the crowds which had assembled
to see him die, because he recognised that all the finessing, the
double meanings, the secret understandings, and the thousand miserable
subterfuges which he imagined to be “statesmanship,” and with which
he had endeavoured to impose on the Scots and on the authorities of
Carisbrooke and of Hampton Court, had done nothing for him, and if
renewed now would have ensured that the fate which he foresaw had
at last overtaken him would be justified by a large section of his
contemporaries. He rose to the occasion. During those few hours at St.
James’s he saw that all he could do would be to save the throne for his
son, and he succeeded, but it was by a line of conduct wholly different
from that by which he had lost it for himself.
The place of execution was most carefully chosen. Though called “the
open street of Whitehall,” it was far from being really open. On
the south were buildings pierced by the narrow archway of Holbein’s
Gate. On the west were the walled tilt-yard and the barracks and
other buildings, ending with Wallingford House. On the north was the
comparatively open roadway to Charing Cross. On the eastern side were
long rows of gabled buildings already described, with, just south of
an archway into the old courts of the palace, the Banqueting House.
It was sworn at the trials of the Regicides, a few years later, that
Oliver Cromwell superintended the arrangements. The evidence is not
well supported, but, owing to Cromwell’s great military reputation and
to his subsequent elevation to the Protectorate, everything at this
conjuncture was attributed to him. It is not very easy to reconcile
the conflicting details of different stories. It neither adds to nor
detracts from Oliver’s guilt, neither adds to nor detracts from his
fame, whether he was at Westminster or at Whitehall on that fatal day.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account