Who were the Pilgrims?Davis, William T. (William Thomas)
History
Who were the Pilgrims?
Davis, William T. (William Thomas)
Puritans -- History
Who Were the Pilgrims?
by
William T. Davis
Harpers New Monthly Magazine
Volume LXIV Number 380
January 1882
The Pilgrims were Separatists from the English Church, and the
offspring of Puritanism. Puritanism was the child of the Reformation.
It may be well in a few preliminary words to follow the various
prominent steps by which that stage of the Reformation was reached from
which the passage to Puritanism and thence to Separatism became easy
and natural.
As early as the year 1350, Bradwardine, the chaplain of Edward the
Third, somewhat infected with the doctrine of Walter Lollard, who
was burned for heresy at Cologne in 1322, induced his royal master
to resist the encroachments of Clement the Sixth on the religious
liberties of England, by passing what was called the Statute of
Provisors, by which imprisonment or banishment was decreed for all who
should procure from the court of Rome any presentation of benefices in
the English Church.
In 1377, Wycliffe, a professor of divinity in the University of Oxford,
came out in open rebellion against the authority of the Pope, and not
only quickened the sluggish blood of the ancient establishment of the
English Church, then well-nigh dead, but increased its current, and
enlarged the channels through which it flowed. In 1393, under Richard
the Second, the Act of Provisors was renewed, and it was also enacted
that whoever should bring into England, receive, publish, or execute
there any papal bull, excommunication, or other like document, should
be out of the King’s protection, and forfeit goods, chattels, and
liberty. This was called the Statute of Præmunire, which signified a
statute fortifying the royal power against foreign assault. Thus for a
time the supremacy of the Pope was technically overthrown in England.
During the succeeding reigns of the houses of York and Lancaster, papal
intrigue succeeded in rendering these statutes a dead letter, and
the old encroachments and usurpations again crept in. It is doubtful
whether these encroachments would have been resisted by Henry the
Eighth if they had not placed obstacles in the way of his divorce
from Catherine. But owing to the determination of Clement to oppose
his wishes in this respect, Henry shook off allegiance to Rome, and
declared himself the head of the Church. Afterward, provoked into
new attitudes of hostility to the Pope, and finally exasperated by a
retaliatory excommunication, he extended the breach between himself and
Rome, already too wide to be healed, until the last span was broken in
the bridge which connected them. Monasteries were suppressed, saintly
shrines were demolished, the worship of images was disallowed, and
Wolsey, a prince of the Roman Church, was arrested under the Act of
Præmunire, and tried for treason. The clergy were dismayed at these
royal acts, but opposed them in vain. The arrest of their cardinal
brought them to terms, for the acts of which he had been found guilty
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account