Historians -- United States -- Biography; Prescott, William Hickling, 1796-1859
"It takes the strength out of me," he said.
Nevertheless, neither this nor the fact that his general health was most
unsatisfactory, caused him to abandon work. He could not bring himself
to use what he called "the coward's word, 'impossible.'" And so, after a
little time, he went on as before, studying "by ear-work," and turning
off upon his noctograph from ten to fifteen pages every day. He
continued also his outdoor exercise, and, in fact, one of the
best-written chapters of the _Conquest of Peru_--the last one--was
composed while galloping through the woods at Pepperell. On November 7,
1846, the _Conquest of Peru_ was finished. Like the preceding history,
it was published by the Harper Brothers, who agreed to pay the author
one dollar per copy and to bring out a first edition of seventy-five
hundred copies. This, Mr. Ticknor says, was a more liberal arrangement
than had ever before been made with an historical writer in the United
States. The English copyright was purchased by Bentley for £800.
Prescott's main anxiety about the reception which would be given to the
_Conquest of Peru_ was based upon his doubts as to its literary style.
Neither of his other books had been written so rapidly, and he feared
that he might incur the charge of over-fluency or even slovenliness.
Yet, as a matter of fact, the chorus of praise which greeted the two
volumes was as loud and as spontaneous as it had been over his _Mexico_.
Prescott now stood so firmly on his feet as to look at much of this
praise in a somewhat humorous light. The approbation of the _Edinburgh
Review_ no longer seemed to him the _summa laus_, though he valued it
more highly than the praise given him by American periodicals, of which
he wrote very shrewdly:
"I don't know how it is, but our critics, though not pedantic, have
not the businesslike air, or the air of the man of the world, which
gives manliness and significance to criticism. Their satire, when
they attempt it--which cannot be often laid to their door--has
neither the fine edge of the _Edinburgh_ nor the sledgehammer
stroke of the _Quarterly_. They twaddle out their humour as if they
were afraid of its biting too hard, or else they deliver axioms
with a sort of smart, dapper conceit, like a little parson laying
down the law to his little people.... In England there is a far
greater number of men highly cultivated--whether in public life or
men of leisure--whose intimacy with affairs and with society, as
well as books, affords supplies of a high order for periodical
criticism."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account