English drama (Comedy); English drama -- 17th century
The reasons for rejecting the date of 1672 thus recounted, there
remains but to notice one inconsiderable particular, which, could we
allow it consequence, would tend to determine the production of _Love
in a Wood_ at a yet earlier date than that to which I have assigned
it. In a conversation with the Duchess, immediately after her visit to
his play, Wycherley, as reported by Dennis, continually addresses her
Grace by the title of "your Ladyship." I doubt not, however, that this
is a mere slip on the part of Dennis, nor can we easily imagine that
Wycherley deferred, until the autumn, the presentation of his play to a
lady who had "commanded" it of him, with such distinguishing marks of
favour, in the preceding spring.
_Love in a Wood_, then, was produced by the King's company, during the
spring of 1671, at the Theatre Royal, in Drury Lane. Some of the first
actors of the day took part in the performances. Hart, who in tragedy
yielded the palm to Betterton alone, appeared as Ranger, Mohun as
Dapperwit; Lacy the comedian, soon afterwards "creator" of Bayes, as
Alderman Gripe; and Kinaston, who in his youth, before women trod the
boards, had been famous in female parts, now, changing sides, enacted
the jealous lover, Valentine. The rôle of Lady Flippant was taken by an
actress well known to us from the pages of Pepys--his favourite Mrs.
Knipp, "a merry jade!"
Upon the whole this play must be owned inferior to Wycherley's
other dramas. It is excelled in unity of action by _The Gentleman
Dancing-Master_, in richness of humour by _The Country Wife_, in
strength of satire by _The Plain Dealer_. Nevertheless, it is a
highly diverting, witty comedy, and strikingly superior to most of
the new plays which, since the Restoration, had preceded it upon the
stage. Some critics would have us believe that Wycherley derived the
suggestion of this play from Sir Charles Sedley's comedy of _The
Mulberry Garden_. It is difficult to understand upon what grounds
this assertion is based. In the first place, although _The Mulberry
Garden_ was produced on the stage in 1668, nearly three years earlier
than _Love in a Wood_, it is exceedingly doubtful if it were earlier
written. Indeed, if Wycherley may be credited as to the year in which
his own play was composed, the question of priority is easily settled,
for _The Mulberry Garden_ cannot have been written until after the
Restoration, as its dénouement turns upon the proclamation of the King
by General Monk. Moreover, it is hardly possible that Wycherley should
have known anything of Sedley's play before its public representation,
as he seems not to have been acquainted with Sedley himself until after
the production of his own drama, so that our acceptance of the theory
that he borrowed from Sedley the hint of _Love in a Wood_ would involve
the unwarrantable conclusion that he also, in conversation with Pope,
antedated its composition by at least eight years. But further, the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account