It is of importance in this connection to bear in mind that five of the poems attributed in English MSS. to Golias and Walter Map, namely, _Missus sum in vineam_, _Multiformis hominum_, _Fallax est et mobilis_, _A tauro torrida_, _Heliconis rivulo_, _Tanto viro locuturi_, among which is the famous Apocalypse ascribed by Salimbene to Primas, are given to Walter of Lille in the Paris MS. edited by Müldner.[50] They are distinguished by a marked unity of style; and what is also significant, a lyric in this Paris MS., _Dum Gualterus aegrotaret_, introduces the poet's name in the same way as the _Versa est in luctum_ of the _Carmina Burana_. Therefore, without identifying Walter of Lille with the Primas, Archipoeta, and Golias, we must allow that his place in Goliardic literature is very considerable. But I am inclined to think that the weight of evidence favours chiefly the ascription of serious and satiric pieces to his pen. It is probable that the Archipoeta, the follower of Reinald von Dassel, the man who composed the most vigorous Goliardic poem we possess, and gave the impulse of his genius to that style of writing, was not the Walter of the _Versa est in luctum_ or of _Dum Gualterus aegrotaret_. That Walter must have been somewhat his junior; and it is not unreasonable to assume that he was Walter of Lille, who may perhaps be further identified with the _Gualtherus sub-prior_ of the poem on the author's poverty. This Walter's Latin designation, _Gualtherus de Insula_, helps, as I have observed above,[51] to explain the attribution of the Goliardic poems in general to Walter Map by English scribes of the fifteenth century. After all, it is safer to indulge in no constructive speculations where the matter of inquiry is both vague and meagre. One thing appears tolerably manifest; that many hands of very various dexterity contributed to form the whole body of songs which we call Goliardic. It is also clear that the Clerici Vagi considered themselves a confraternity, and that they burlesqued the institutions of a religious order, pretending to honour and obey a primate or bishop, to whom the nickname of Golias was given at the period in which they flourished most. Viewed in his literary capacity, this chief was further designated as the Archpoet. Of his personality we know as little as we do of that of Homer. FOOTNOTES: [Footnote 36: Grimm's _Gedichte des Mittelalters_, p. 232.] [Footnote 37: _Carm. Bur._, p. 254.] [Footnote 38: Page 69.] [Footnote 39: Giesebrecht in _Allg. Monatschrift_. Jan. 1853. p. 35.] [Footnote 40: Op. cit., p. 182.] [Footnote 41: Ib., p. 232.] [Footnote 42: Ib., pp. 238, 239.] [Footnote 43: Published at Parma, 1857.] [Footnote 44: See Novati, _Carmina Medii Aevi_, p. 8, note.] [Footnote 45: _Decameron_, i, 7.] [Footnote 46: See above, p. 21.] [Footnote 47: Grimm, op. cit., p. 189 et seq.]