Wit and its relation to the unconsciousFreud, Sigmund
Science
Wit and its relation to the unconscious
Freud, Sigmund
Subconsciousness; Wit and humor -- Psychological aspects
Thus, according to our assumption, the conditions for laughter are such
that a sum of psychic energy hitherto employed in the occupation of some
paths may experience free discharge. And since not all laughter, (but
surely the laughter of wit), is a sign of pleasure, we shall be inclined
to refer this pleasure to the release of previously existing static
energy (_Besetzungsenergie_). When we see that the hearer of the
witticism laughs, while the creator of the same cannot, then that must
indicate that in the hearer a sum of damming energy has been released
and discharged, whereas during the wit-formation, either in the release
or in the discharge, inhibitions resulted. One can characterize the
psychic process in the hearer, in the third person of the witticism,
hardly more pointedly than by asserting that he has bought the pleasure
of the witticism with very little expenditure on his part. One might say
that it is presented to him. The words of the witticism which he hears
necessarily produce in him that idea or thought-connection whose
formation in him was also resisted by great inner hindrances. He would
have had to make an effort of his own in order to bring it about
spontaneously like the first person, or he would have had to put forth
at least as much psychic expenditure as to equalize the force of the
suppression or repression of the inhibition. This psychic expenditure he
has saved himself; according to our former discussion (p. 80) we should
say that his pleasure corresponds to this economy. Following our
understanding of the mechanism of laughter we should be more likely to
say that the static energy utilized in the inhibition has now suddenly
become superfluous and neutralized because a forbidden idea came into
existence on the way to auditory perception and is therefore ready to be
discharged through laughter. Essentially both statements amount to the
same thing, for the economized expenditure corresponds exactly to the
now superfluous inhibition. The latter statement is more obvious, for it
permits us to say that the hearer of the witticism laughs with the
amount of psychic energy which was liberated by the suspension of
inhibition energy; that is, he laughs away, as it were, this amount of
psychic energy.
_Why the First Person Does Not Laugh_
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account