Wit and its relation to the unconsciousFreud, Sigmund
Science
Wit and its relation to the unconscious
Freud, Sigmund
Subconsciousness; Wit and humor -- Psychological aspects
There is still another objection which would not be vital, but which
could not be so completely refuted. One might think that the techniques
of wit that fit in so well considering the ends we have in view deserve
recognition, but that they do not represent all possible techniques of
wit or even all those in use. Also that we have selected only the
techniques of wit which were influenced by and would suit the pattern of
the dream-work, whereas others ignored by us would have demonstrated
that such an agreement was not common to all cases. I really do not
trust myself to make the assertion that I have succeeded in explaining
all the current witticisms with reference to their techniques, and I
therefore admit the possibility that my enumeration of wit-techniques
may show many gaps. But I have not purposely excluded from my discussion
any form of technique that was clear to me, and I can affirm that the
most frequent, the most essential, and the most characteristic technical
means of wit have not eluded my attention.
_Wit as an Inspiration_
Wit possesses still another character which entirely corresponds to our
conception of the wit-work as originally discovered in our study of
dreams. It is true that it is common to hear one say “I _made_ a joke,”
but one feels that one behaves differently during this process than when
one pronounces a judgment or offers an objection. Wit shows in a most
pronounced manner the character of an involuntary “inspiration” or a
sudden flash of thought. A moment before one cannot tell what kind of
joke one is going to make, though it lacks only the words to clothe it.
One usually experiences something indefinable which I should like most
to compare to an absence, or sudden drop of intellectual tension; then
all of a sudden the witticism appears, usually simultaneously with its
verbal investment. Some of the means of wit are also utilized in the
expression of thought along other lines, as in the cases of comparison
and allusion. I can purposely will to make an allusion. In doing this I
have first in mind (in the inner hearing) the direct expression of my
thought, but as I am inhibited from expressing the same through some
objection from the situation in question, I almost resolve to substitute
the direct expression by a form of indirect expression, and then I utter
it in the form of an allusion. But the allusion that comes into
existence in this manner having been formed under my continuous control
is never witty, no matter how useful it may be. On the other hand, the
witty allusion appears without my having been able to follow up these
preparatory stages in my mind. I do not wish to attribute too much value
to this procedure, it is scarcely decisive, but it does agree well with
our assumption that in wit-formation a stream of thought is dropped for
a moment and suddenly emerges from the unconscious as a witticism.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account