Wit and its relation to the unconsciousFreud, Sigmund
Science
Wit and its relation to the unconscious
Freud, Sigmund
Subconsciousness; Wit and humor -- Psychological aspects
Some of the fusions taken from the preface and the first pages are the
following: “_Turkey’s money is like the hay of the sea._” This is only a
condensation of the two expressions, “Money like hay,” “Money like the
sands of the sea.” Or: “_I am nothing but a leafless pillar which tells
of a vanished splendor_,” which is a fusion of “leafless trunk” and “a
pillar which, etc.” Or: “_Where is Ariadne’s thread which leads out of
the Scylla of this Augean stable?_” for which three different Greek
myths contribute an element each.
The modifications and substitutions can be treated collectively without
much forcing; their character can be seen from the following examples
which are peculiar to Wippchen, they are regularly permeated by a
different wording which is more fluent, most banal, and reduced to mere
platitudes.
“_To hang my paper and ink high._” The saying: “To hang one’s
bread-basket high,” expresses metaphorically the idea of placing one
under difficult conditions. But why not stretch this figure to other
material?
“_Already in my youth Pegasus was alive in me._” When the word “pegasus”
is replaced by “the poet,” one can recognize it as an expression often
used in autobiographies. Naturally “pegasus” is not the proper word to
replace the words “the poet,” but it has thought associations to it and
is a high-sounding word.
From Wippchen’s other numerous productions some examples can be shown
which present the pure comic. As an example of comic disillusionment the
following can be cited: “_For hours the battle raged, finally it
remained undecisive_”; an example of comical unmasking (of ignorance) is
the following: “_Clio, the Medusa of history_,” or quotations like the
following: “_Habent sua fata morgana._” But our interest is aroused more
by the fusions and modifications because they recall familiar techniques
of wit. We may compare them to such modification witticisms as the
following: “He has a great future behind him,” and Lichtenberg’s
modification witticisms such as: “New baths heal well,” etc. Should
Wippchen’s productions having the same technique be called witticisms,
or what distinguishes them from the latter?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account