Wit and its relation to the unconsciousFreud, Sigmund
Science
Wit and its relation to the unconscious
Freud, Sigmund
Subconsciousness; Wit and humor -- Psychological aspects
If we keep in mind that tendency-wit is so well adapted as a weapon of
attack upon what is great, dignified, and mighty, that which is shielded
by internal hindrances or external circumstance against direct
disparagement, we are forced to a special conception of certain groups
of witticisms which seem to occupy themselves with inferior and
powerless persons. I am referring to the marriage-agent stories,—with a
few of which we have become familiar in the investigation of the
manifold techniques of thought-wit. In some of these examples, “But she
is deaf, too!” and “Who in the world would ever lend these people
anything!” the agent was derided as a careless and thoughtless person
who becomes comical because the truth escapes his lips automatically, as
it were. But does on the one hand what we have learned about the nature
of tendency-wit, and on the other hand the amount of satisfaction in
these stories, harmonize with the misery of the persons at whom the joke
seems to be pointed? Are these worthy opponents of the wit? Or, is it
not more plausible to suppose that the wit puts the agent in the
foreground only in order to strike at something more important; does it,
as the saying goes, strike the saddle pack, when it is meant for the
mule? This conception can really not be rejected.
The above-mentioned interpretation of the marriage-agent stories admits
of a continuation. It is true that I need not enter into them, that I
can content myself with seeing the farcical in these stories, and can
dispute their witty character. However, such subjective determination of
wit actually exists. We have now become cognizant of it and shall later
on have to investigate it. It means that only that is a witticism which
I wish to consider as such. What may be wit to me, may be only an
amusing story to another. But if a witticism admits of doubt, that can
be due only to the fact that it is possessed of a show-side,—in our
examples it happens to be a façade of the comic,—upon which one may be
satisfied to bestow a single glance while another may attempt to peep
behind. We also suspect that this façade is intended to dazzle the
prying glance which is to say that such stories have something to
conceal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account