India. Army; World War, 1914-1918 -- Campaigns -- Western Front; World War, 1914-1918 -- Regimental histories -- India
What is now being wisely done is to increase the pay of the Indian
officers and men. The pay of Indian officers especially was almost an
insult to a class so loyal and devoted, and it must be very largely
increased; they should be given rank corresponding to their British
comrades, and precedence equal to, if not above, their civilian
confrères.
This was one of the sorest points with Indian officers. To the ordinary
observer like myself, at Durbars and public gatherings it was plain that
they never received their proper share of _Izzat_ (honour). No doubt I
shall be told this was all thought out and arranged by the Government,
but I speak from practical experience, not from the edicts of Simla and
Delhi. The Indian officer was not treated with the respect which was his
due and which he has earned in arduous service on many fields of war. It
was a feeling very strongly held by them and must be set right. _Izzat_
is a thing little understood by any but Indians, but it is a great
driving force; it raises men in the estimation of their fellows, whilst
the loss of it debases them.
Public opinion as understood in this country was nonexistent in India.
It was a one-man country; if the man was a strong personality he could
do much; if he was undecided his share became a small one, and good old
Indian _dustoor_ (custom) settled the question in the prehistoric
fashion.
Under the Indian officers are the N.C.O.’s and men. I have soldiered
with Rajputs and Jats, Pathans, Sikhs, Gurkhas, Punjabi Mahomedans,
Madras Sappers and Miners, Dogras, Garhwalis and other races. Each has
its characteristics, and these must be recognised by any one entrusted
with the command of Indian troops. You cannot place them in one mould;
you will not get from them their best, unless they recognise that they
are understood.
One of my chief difficulties at the beginning of this war was to make it
understood that the Indians cannot be treated as pure machines, and that
they possess national characteristics as varied as those between
Scandinavians and Italians. I own that Sir John French and his Staff
generally made every allowance for these facts, but there were others
who made none; an Army Corps (no matter its fighting strength in
numbers) was an Army Corps and nothing else. An Army Corps was supposed
to be able to occupy so many thousand yards of trenches, and the orders
were issued by this routine rule.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account