India. Army; World War, 1914-1918 -- Campaigns -- Western Front; World War, 1914-1918 -- Regimental histories -- India
By 5 P.M., 9th May, it was clear from reports received from G.O.C.
Bareilly Brigade, Artillery observation-officers, and the First British
Division that all attacks, both of the First and Meerut Divisions had
failed. After a telephonic conversation with the G.O.C. Meerut Division
the Garhwal Brigade was ordered to take over the front line from
Bareilly, and this was finally effected by 1 A.M. midnight of the
9th-10th May. The failure of the attacks on this day were due to the
insufficient effect produced by the Artillery bombardment and to the
great volume of extremely accurate machine-gun fire from front and
flanks. As regards the insufficient effect of the Artillery bombardment,
it must be remembered that, after their experience in front of Neuve
Chapelle on 10th to 13th March, the Germans realised that breastworks of
exceptional strength were required, and had accordingly devoted their
energies to the construction of improved parapets of great thickness,
especially on both sides of the Estaires-La Bassée road, as to the
safety of which they were anxious. They had also largely increased the
number of machine-guns employed in their front line, locating them in
dug-outs heavily strutted with timber, which admitted of the
machine-guns being fired just above ground level, and ensured the safety
of the detachments during the bombardment. The light shell of our field
guns appeared to produce but small results on these improved parapets,
and even high-explosive shell had only very local effects. A very
considerable proportion of our H.E. shell also failed to detonate
satisfactorily. The fire of our 18-pounder guns was accurate enough, as
proved by the manner in which the enemy’s wire entanglements had been
cut, but owing to some defect in the construction of the shell there
were, and continued to be, a very unduly large number of prematures. As
regards the fire of our howitzers, both those of 4·5-inch and those of
6·0-inch calibre, the extreme accuracy which we had become accustomed to
obtain with them had fallen off considerably as the guns became worn by
the large number of rounds fired. In the various intensive bombardments,
too, it was reported by the Infantry that a large proportion of our
shell had fallen short of the enemy’s front line parapets. This was
largely accounted for by the error of the gun, which at the ranges fired
at hardly ensured more than twenty-five per cent of shell actually
hitting the point aimed at.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account