With the movie makersStearns, Myron M. (Myron Morris)
General
With the movie makers
Stearns, Myron M. (Myron Morris)
Motion pictures -- Juvenile literature
Those losses are the things we rarely hear about. It is the successes
that are recounted. Mike Maginnity, who took all his sister’s money
and started for San Francisco in ’49, turned up again, dead broke, ten
years later. He had made one or two little strikes, over a half a dozen
years, and used the money to pay off part of the debts he had already
run up—perhaps at the Buckeye Saloon. That was all—and we never heard
about him.
But we did hear about the big fellows who struck it yellow, and the
piles they made. And you may be sure that, as Mr. Kipling says, the
tales lost no fat in the telling.
Up to the present time, the producers or “owners” in motion pictures
are mostly just the run of little fellows who have happened to land on
their feet, and made the most of it.
And, since in making pictures, as in everything else, the final product
can be no better than the brains at the top of the organization, we
have had to wait for better pictures until, little by little, the movie
game assumed greater stability, and began to attract men of larger
caliber, with better ideas of just what was really worth while, and
what was not.
Don’t imagine for a moment that Bodfish or Isabella was ever run as
well, or had as good a school or as good streets, or as good houses,
or as much real comfort, as your own home town. The best lawyers, and
the best school-teachers, and the best carpenters, and the best road
makers, were still in the East. Even the best saloon-keepers, for the
most part, had not made the journey. Only the best gamblers, and best
prospectors, and some of the best fighters and adventurers, were there.
Just as with the men on the Los Angeles paper, the first writers
to leave the comparatively sure living of their chosen branch of
work—whether newspaper-reporting or novel-writing, or contributing to
magazines—were not the best. Mostly, indeed, far from it. It was the
fellow afraid of being squeezed out who was glad of a chance to pick up
a few dollars at the new movie game—packing his kit, as it were, and
lighting out into the unknown towards the new gold fields.
And as with authors, so with artists.
Photographers were something of an exception, for the motion-picture
camera, from the very first, offered more possibilities than did the
“still” camera previously used.
Accordingly, photography in the movies has been ahead of all other
artistic branches of work; it was the first to reach a comparatively
high level. To-day motion picture photography is uniformly good,
and often exceptionally fine, while the writing end of the game, and
the editing—in fact, nearly all the other essential branches of film
story-telling—are still busy “catching up.”
Also, to be sure, the principle did not apply particularly to
electricians or carpenters or other laborers, to whom a day’s work
was a day’s work, with a union wage, likely, at whatever odd job it
happened to be.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account