But does it not follow that the moment we attempt to reach into the
secrets of God we are perfectly certain to meet with difficulty? We get
out of depth directly, and are like people who cannot swim. For how can
the human mind, for one moment, expect to solve the mysteries of the deep
things of God? How can it aspire either to fathom its depths, or to
scale its heights? Think for one moment what man is, a little creature
on this little ball of earth, here for a few years, and then passing away
for ever. And think what He is, “the high and lofty One that inhabiteth
eternity, whose name is Holy,” the “everlasting God, the Creator of the
ends of the earth.” And is it likely that man should be able to put as
it were into the balances the deep mysteries of His eternal will? When
Zophar thought of it he said (Job xi. 7, 8), “Canst thou by searching
find out God? canst thou find out the Almighty unto perfection? It is as
high as heaven; what canst thou do? deeper than hell; what canst thou
know?” When David thought of the knowledge of God, he said (Psalm
cxxxix. 6), “Such knowledge is too wonderful for me; it is high, I cannot
attain unto it.” When St. Paul was meeting the objection of those who
cavilled at the righteousness of the government of God, he met them with
the words (Rom. ix. 20), “Nay, but, O man, who art thou that repliest
against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast
thou made me thus?” And when the Sadducees put a difficult puzzle on the
subject of the resurrection, our Lord Himself silenced them with the
words, “Ye do err, not knowing the Scriptures, nor the power of God.”
(Matt. xxii 29.) And were they not all right? Shall the finite sit in
judgment on the infinite? the created on the Creator? the man of to-day
on the God of all eternity? And are we to doubt His revelation because
we cannot fathom the depths of His wisdom nor the hidden mysteries of His
being? Nay, rather, are not those very depths witnesses to the divinity
of His revelation? If it were all so shallow that any young man could
wade in it without wetting even his ancles, might we not then believe
that it came from some shallow mind no deeper than his own? If it
contained no mysteries, might we not begin to doubt whether it really
came from a mysterious God? So these difficulties of which we hear so
much in modern times, these difficulties on which so many of our young
men are so perfectly ready to decide, and on account of which they are
even tempted to cast aside the revelation of God—these very difficulties
are to us who believe, divine “witnesses” to the divine authorship of the
whole. Had the Book been a man’s book, drawn up by man to commend itself
to the mind of man, it never would have had in it those high and holy
mysteries by which we see the intellect of man altogether baffled. Man’s
mind would have produced nothing which man’s mind could not comprehend.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account