English poetry -- 19th century; Women -- History; Women -- Social conditions; Women -- Suffrage
“SIR,—Professor Horsley’s criticism on the above work—planned and
compiled by my direction—demands from me a careful reply, which I
shall endeavour to give as soon as may be possible at this distance
from the books whence the impugned passages are derived. I shall be
much surprised if the hocus pocus of the sham anæsthetic _curare_ with
ineffective applications of genuine chloroform do not once more
illustrate ‘the curse of vivisectible animals,’ and if the results of
the experiments in question, whatever were their worth, would not, in
most cases, have been vitiated had real and absolute anæsthesia been
produced in the victims. Should a small number of the experiments
cited in the ‘Nine Circles’ prove, however, to have been performed on
animals in an entirely painless state, I shall, while withdrawing them
with apologies from a forthcoming new edition of the book, take care
at the same time to call attention to the multitude of other
experiments, home and foreign, therein recorded—e.g., baking to death,
poisoning, starving, creating all manner of diseases, inoculating in
the eyes, dissecting out and irritating the exposed nerves, causing
the brain of cats ‘to run like cream,’ etc., about which no room for
doubt as to the unassuaged agony of the animal can possibly exist.”
Miss Cobbe concludes by a sharp, but just, criticism on her critic, and
with an acute diagnosis of the learned vivisectionist’s own condition:—
“The tone of Dr. Horsley’s remarks against me personally will probably
inspire those who know me and the history of my connexion with the
anti-vivisection cause with an amused sense of the difficulty wherein
the Professor must have found himself when, instead of argument in
defence of vivisection, he thus turned to ‘abuse the plaintiffs’
attorney.’ For myself I gladly accept such abuse (or mere bluster) as
evidence that the consciences even of eminent vivisectors are, like
their victims’ nerves, imperfectly under the influence of the
scientific anæsthesia, and remain still sensitive to the
heart-pricking charge which I bring against them, of cowardly cruelty
to defenceless creatures.
“I am, Sir, yours,
FRANCES POWER COBBE.
Hengwrt, Dolgelly, Oct. 8th, 1892.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account