Woman; Her Position and Influence in Ancient Greece and Rome, and Among the Early ChristiansDonaldson, James, Sir
History
Woman; Her Position and Influence in Ancient Greece and Rome, and Among the Early Christians
Donaldson, James, Sir
Women -- Greece; Women -- History -- To 500; Women -- Rome
Κουριδίη ἄλοχος in all probability means the wife who belonged by
birth to the predominant and free race to which the husband also
belonged. She was κουριδίη in opposition to the stranger and slave,
who however, might have belonged to an equally free and predominant
race in their own country,[187] and who might be, as Agamemnon says of
Chryseis,[188] “not inferior to the regular wife in form or stature or
in mind and skill in works.” The word does not signify, as many of the
scholiasts influenced by later customs suggested, the lawfully wedded
wife, as there was no law, but only custom, in Homeric times. In the
same way the word nothos (νόθος) was afterwards taken to mean, and
in later Greek did mean, illegitimate and spurious. But it could not
mean illegitimate in Homeric times, for there was no law in regard to
offspring. And it is doubtful if it could be spurious, for as Hruza has
pointed out in the passage referred to, the Homeric Greeks, like some
later Greeks mentioned hereafter, were probably of opinion that the son
partook of the substance of the father and derived nothing essential
from the mother, her function in birth being conceived to be very
much that of the modern incubator. The sons were therefore always the
genuine sons of their fathers. The word γνήσιος which in later Greek
signified genuine, occurs only once in the ‘Iliad’[189] and once in the
‘Odyssey.’[190] Both passages may be later interpolations and the text
of the passage in the ‘Odyssey’ is uncertain, for the Harleian MS. of
the scholia has “born of wives” instead of “born of a wife.” It also
contains a word which occurs nowhere else in Homer, ἰθαιγενής, “born in
the straight line,” probably meaning born of a mother who belonged to
the predominant race or, as moderns would say, to the good society of
her city or country. The chance of text corruptions in this matter is
seen in a passage in the ‘Iliad’[191] where one transcriber, not being
able to understand the words καβησόθεν ἔνδον, altered them into Ἑκάβης
νόθον υἱόν: “the nothic son of Hecabe”!
(2) THE DARKER SIDE OF THE QUESTION.
Some students of Homer may think that I have drawn too mild a picture
of the life and character of Homeric women. They would base their
criticism on some passages of which I have not taken note. These would
be the following:--
In the ‘Odyssey’ a number of women behave badly. They take the side of
the suitors, and act insolently to Ulysses on his return. Especially
the slave Melantho, to whom Penelope had been particularly kind, is
shameless and forward, and Ulysses applies to her epithets that express
strong contempt. But such cases are exceedingly few, and are well
accounted for by special circumstances.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account