Women -- Employment -- United States; Women -- Social and moral questions
BY
MARY PUTNAM JACOBI, M.D.
“Fifty years hence, it will be difficult to gain credit for the
assertion that American women acquiesced throughout the former half of
the 19th century, in the complete monopoly of the medical profession
by men, even including midwifery, and the diseases peculiar to women.
The current usage in this respect is monstrous.”—_New York Tribune_,
Editorial, 1853.
The history of the movement for introducing women into the full practice
of the medical profession is one of the most interesting of modern
times. This movement has already achieved much, and far more than is
often supposed. Yet the interest lies even less in what has been so far
achieved, than in the opposition which has been encountered: in the
nature of this opposition; in the pretexts on which it has been
sustained, and in the reasonings, more or less disingenuous, by which it
has claimed its justification. The history, therefore, is a record not
more of fact, than of opinion. And the opinions expressed have often
been so grave and solid in appearance, yet proved so frivolous and empty
in view of the subsequent event, that their history is not unworthy
careful consideration among that of other solemn follies of mankind.
In Europe, the admission of women to the profession of medicine has been
widely opposed because of disbelief in their intellectual capacity.[32]
In America it is less often permitted to doubt—out loud—the intellectual
capacity of women. The controversy has therefore been shifted to the
entirely different ground of decorum.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account